Operationalizing Network & SErvice abstractioNs
charter-ietf-onsen-01

Yes

Mahesh Jethanandani

No Objection

Andy Newton
Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mike Bishop
Roman Danyliw
Tommy Jensen

No Record

Mohamed Boucadair

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-02 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Mahesh Jethanandani
Yes
Andy Newton
No Objection
Charles Eckel
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-17 for -00-04) Sent 
One nit, in the last bullet:

OLD
... by these WG will remain in these WGs
NEW
... by these WGs will remain in these WGs
Christopher Inacio
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-16 for -00-03) Sent 
Some comments:

s/The ONSEN WG aims to make IETF service and network abstractions easier to implement and use, improving automation,/The ONSEN WG aims to make IETF service and network abstractions easier to implement and use, *therefore* improving automation,/

Be specific about the intended publication status for the docs in `The WG may decide that some documents, such as the problem statement, use-cases, scope, and priorities, are not intended for RFC publication and will be maintained as WG documents`

In the list of relationships, aggregate the ones about `BESS/CCAMP/TEAS:`
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
No Objection
Mike Bishop
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-17 for -00-03) Not sent 
Consider making the list of items a bulleted list rather than a wall of text.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Tommy Jensen
No Objection
Mohamed Boucadair
No Record
Comment (2026-06-11 for -00-02) Not sent 
I prefer to recuse although I'm not involved in any of the proposed updates that build on work I co-authored.