Skip to main content

IETF conflict review for draft-hausenblas-csv-fragment
conflict-review-hausenblas-csv-fragment-02

Yes


No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Richard Barnes)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Ted Lemon)

Abstain


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2013-10-09 for -01) Unknown
The change to the text/csv media type registration requires separate IESG approval, as the IESG is the change controller for that registration.  I have requested a management item for that on the same telechat.  The updated text/csv registration template is in Section 5.1 of the document.
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes, Discuss) Yes
Yes (2013-10-10) Unknown
With the Last Call, and the IESG Note, I am satisfied that this No Conflict is OK.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-10-07 for -00) Unknown
Pete's point seems valid.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-10-09 for -00) Unknown
I'll trust Pete on that one.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-10-08 for -00) Unknown
I agree with Pete's suggested conflict review text.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Unknown

                            
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Unknown

                            
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-10-09 for -00) Unknown
Pete has raised the point already.
Richard Barnes Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -00) Unknown

                            
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2013-10-10 for -01) Unknown
Section 6 is pretty uninformative, which is a pity. Might be
a good test for whoever's tooling up to handle drafts 
with 6982 sections though:-)
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Unknown

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Abstain
Abstain (2013-10-09 for -00) Unknown
I agree with Pete.