IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve
conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve-00

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: Colin Perkins ,
    Internet Research Steering Group ,
    Nick Sullivan ,
    cfrg-chairs@ietf.org,
    draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve@ietf.org,
    irtf-chair@irtf.org,
    nicholas.sullivan+ietf@gmail.com
Cc: IETF-Announce ,
    The IESG ,
    iana@iana.org
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve-16

The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve-16
consistent with RFC5742.

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'KangarooTwelve and
TurboSHAKE'  as an Informational RFC.

The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in WG PPM,
but this relationship does not prevent publishing.

The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and
the history log.

The IESG review is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve/

A URL of the reviewed Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve/

The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

[Ballot comment]
The relationship with PPM is really small to my non-crypto eyes, so, I wonder whether it should even be mentioned. But, I am trusting the SEC ADs on this topic.