IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-iccrg-ledbat-plus-plus
conflict-review-irtf-iccrg-ledbat-plus-plus-01

Yes

Gorry Fairhurst
Mike Bishop

No Objection

Andy Newton
Charles Eckel
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mohamed Boucadair
Roman Danyliw
Tommy Jensen

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Gorry Fairhurst
Yes
Comment (2026-06-04) Not sent 
LEDBAT++ is a sender-side algorithm  for CC. It specifies a set of enhancements to the LEDBAT (Low Extra Delay Background Transport) congestion control algorithm for TCP, with experience from one implementation. This work is a product of ICCRG and is proposed as an Experimental RFC. This is a successor to LEDBAT, RFC 6817,  itself an Experimental RFC, which was a product of the Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat) working group.  

LEDBAT++  was adopted by ICCRG in 2020, and the ICCRG Charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-irtf-iccrg/) permits ICCRG to publish “Experimental or Informational RFCs”. Rledbat, [RFC 9840] was also published by ICCRG. 

Note: This ICCRG work item precedes the creation of the IETF CC WG which will focus on Standards-track CC. Algorithms proposed for Experimental status can now be in scope for CCWG (in consultation with ICCRG, based on an assessment of their maturity and likelihood of near-term wide-scale deployment). This does not prevent publication of LEDBAT++ by ICCRG.
Mike Bishop
Yes
Andy Newton
No Objection
Charles Eckel
No Objection
Christopher Inacio
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
No Objection
Mohamed Boucadair
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Tommy Jensen
No Objection