IETF conflict review for draft-joseph-pkix-p6rsshextension
conflict-review-joseph-pkix-p6rsshextension-01
Yes
(Sean Turner)
No Objection
(Barry Leiba)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Pete Resnick)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -00)
Unknown
No objection modulo what Pete says
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -00)
Unknown
I agree that a straight "no conflict" is more appropriate.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -00)
Unknown
I believe Pete's observation here is correct.