Randomized Response Mechanisms in RRT Measurements for HTTP/3
draft-andersdotter-rrm-for-rrt-in-http3-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Amelia Andersdotter , Shivan Kaul Sahib | ||
| Last updated | 2020-05-06 (Latest revision 2019-11-03) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-andersdotter-rrm-for-rtt-in-quic | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-andersdotter-rrm-for-rtt-in-quic | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The latency spin bit is an optional feature included in the QUIC transport protocol [I-D-QUIC]. It enables passive, on-path observations for estimation of latency. This document presents the results of an inquiry into the potential of using randomized response mechanisms (RRM) to reduce privacy loss in latency measurements. It concludes that RRM could be used to introduce choice for clients in preserving privacy in latency measurements. But the trade-offs, especially since the latency spin bit is already optional, do not favour RRM.
Authors
Amelia Andersdotter
Shivan Kaul Sahib
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)