Remote Attestation Procedures Architecture
draft-birkholz-rats-architecture-03
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2020-05-07 (latest revision 2019-11-04) | ||
| Replaces | draft-birkholz-attestation-terminology | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-birkholz-rats-architecture-03.txt
Abstract
An entity (a relying party) requires a source of truth and evidence about a remote peer to assess the peer's trustworthiness. The evidence is typically a believable set of claims about its host, software or hardware platform. This document describes an architecture for such remote attestation procedures (RATS).
Authors
Henk Birkholz
(henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de)
Monty Wiseman
(monty.wiseman@ge.com)
Hannes Tschofenig
(Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net)
Ned Smith
(ned.smith@intel.com)
Michael Richardson
(mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)