Remote Attestation Procedures Architecture
draft-birkholz-rats-architecture-03
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Henk Birkholz , Monty Wiseman , Hannes Tschofenig , Ned Smith , Michael Richardson | ||
| Last updated | 2020-05-07 (Latest revision 2019-11-04) | ||
| Replaces | draft-birkholz-attestation-terminology | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 9334 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-rats-architecture | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
An entity (a relying party) requires a source of truth and evidence about a remote peer to assess the peer's trustworthiness. The evidence is typically a believable set of claims about its host, software or hardware platform. This document describes an architecture for such remote attestation procedures (RATS).
Authors
Henk Birkholz
Monty Wiseman
Hannes Tschofenig
Ned Smith
Michael Richardson
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)