Skip to main content

CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri" Application-oriented Extension
draft-bormann-core-cri-diagnostic-notation-00

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Author Carsten Bormann
Last updated 2026-11-02
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-bormann-core-cri-diagnostic-notation-00
Constrained RESTful Environments                              C. Bormann
Internet-Draft                                    Universität Bremen TZI
Intended status: Standards Track                         2 November 2026
Expires: 6 May 2027

     CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri" Application-oriented Extension
             draft-bormann-core-cri-diagnostic-notation-00

Abstract

   For the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR), a Concise
   Diagnostic Notation (CDN) has been defined in draft-ietf-cbor-edn-
   literals.  This provides an extension point for "App-Extension
   Identifiers" registry in the "Concise Diagnostic Notation" registry
   group, supporting text representations of CBOR tags and other
   structures to enhance usability.

   The present document specifies an app-extension and registers an app-
   extension identifier for CBOR tag 99, Constrained Resource
   Identifiers (CRI), as defined in RFC-to-be 9988.

   // (This cref will be removed by the RFC editor:) This document
   // carries the specification of the cri'' application- oriented
   // prefix for CBOR diagnostic notation.  This specification used to
   // be in the CoRE WG document for CRIs, became part of the CBOR WG
   // document for CBOR diagnostic notation when the CBOR WG document
   // was delayed, and was then deleted from that document as it is
   // outside the scope of the CBOR WG.  So this document now goes back
   // to the CoRE WG, as a "new" individual submission.

About This Document

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Status information for this document may be found at
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-core-cri-diagnostic-
   notation/.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the core Working Group
   mailing list (mailto:core@ietf.org), which is archived at
   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/.  Subscribe at
   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/cabo/draft-bormann-core-cri-diagnostic-notation.

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 1]
Internet-Draft       CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri"       November 2026

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 6 May 2027.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Concise Resource Identifiers: The "cri" Extension . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  cri: ABNF Definition of URI Representation of a CRI . . .   3
   3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.1.  Concise Diagnostic Notation App-extension Identifiers
           Registry  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   5.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 2]
Internet-Draft       CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri"       November 2026

1.  Introduction

   (To be derived from abstract, q.v.)  [STD94]

1.1.  Conventions and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   [BCP14] (RFC2119) (RFC8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  Concise Resource Identifiers: The "cri" Extension

   The app-extension identifier "cri" is used to notate a CDN literal
   for a CRI reference as defined in [I-D.ietf-core-href].

   The input of the literal is a URI Reference as per [RFC3986] or an
   IRI Reference as per [RFC3987].

   The value of the literal is a CRI reference that can be converted to
   the text of the literal using the procedure of Section 6.1 of
   [I-D.ietf-core-href].  Note that there may be more than one CRI
   reference that can be converted to the URI/IRI reference given;
   implementations are expected to favor the simplest variant available
   and make non-surprising choices otherwise.  In the all-uppercase
   variant of the app-prefix, the value is enclosed in a tag number 99.

   As an example, the CDN

   cri'https://example.com/bottarga/shaved'
   CRI'https://example.com/bottarga/shaved'

   is equivalent to

   [-4, ["example", "com"], ["bottarga", "shaved"]]
   99([-4, ["example", "com"], ["bottarga", "shaved"]])

   See Section 2.1 for an ABNF [STD68] definition for the content of cri
   literals.

2.1.  cri: ABNF Definition of URI Representation of a CRI

   It can be expected that implementations of the app-extension
   identifier "cri" will make use of platform-provided URI
   implementations, which will include a URI parser.

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 3]
Internet-Draft       CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri"       November 2026

   In case such a URI parser is not available or inconvenient to
   integrate, a grammar of the content of cri literals is provided by
   the ABNF for URI-reference in Section 4.1 of RFC 3986 [RFC3986] with
   certain re-arrangements taken from Section 5.2.4 of
   [I-D.ietf-cbor-edn-literals]; these are reproduced in Figure 1.  If
   the content is not ASCII only (i.e., for IRIs), first apply
   Section 3.1 of [RFC3987] and apply this grammar to the result.

   app-string-cri = URI-reference
   ; ABNF from RFC 3986:

   URI           = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

   hier-part     = "//" authority path-abempty
                    / path-absolute
                    / path-rootless
                    / path-empty

   URI-reference = URI / relative-ref

   absolute-URI  = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ]

   relative-ref  = relative-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

   relative-part = "//" authority path-abempty
                    / path-absolute
                    / path-noscheme
                    / path-empty

   scheme        = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )

   authority     = [ userinfo "@" ] host [ ":" port ]
   userinfo      = *( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" )
   host          = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name
   port          = *DIGIT

   IP-literal    = "[" ( IPv6address / IPvFuture  ) "]"

   IPvFuture     = "v" 1*HEXDIG "." 1*( unreserved / sub-delims / ":" )

   ; Use IPv6address, h16, ls32, IPv4adress, dec-octet as re-arranged
   ; for PEG Compatibility in Figure 6 of [RFC XXXX]:

   IPv6address   =                            6( h16 ":" ) ls32
                 /                       "::" 5( h16 ":" ) ls32
                 / [ h16               ] "::" 4( h16 ":" ) ls32
                 / [ h16 *1( ":" h16 ) ] "::" 3( h16 ":" ) ls32
                 / [ h16 *2( ":" h16 ) ] "::" 2( h16 ":" ) ls32

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 4]
Internet-Draft       CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri"       November 2026

                 / [ h16 *3( ":" h16 ) ] "::"    h16 ":"   ls32
                 / [ h16 *4( ":" h16 ) ] "::"              ls32
                 / [ h16 *5( ":" h16 ) ] "::"              h16
                 / [ h16 *6( ":" h16 ) ] "::"

   h16           = 1*4HEXDIG
   ls32          = ( h16 ":" h16 ) / IPv4address
   IPv4address   = dec-octet "." dec-octet "." dec-octet "." dec-octet
   dec-octet     = "25" %x30-35         ; 250-255
                 / "2" %x30-34 DIGIT    ; 200-249
                 / "1" 2DIGIT           ; 100-199
                 / %x31-39 DIGIT        ; 10-99
                 / DIGIT                ; 0-9

   reg-name      = *( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims )

   path          = path-abempty    ; begins with "/" or is empty
                    / path-absolute   ; begins with "/" but not "//"
                    / path-noscheme   ; begins with a non-colon segment
                    / path-rootless   ; begins with a segment
                    / path-empty      ; zero characters

   path-abempty  = *( "/" segment )
   path-absolute = "/" [ segment-nz *( "/" segment ) ]
   path-noscheme = segment-nz-nc *( "/" segment )
   path-rootless = segment-nz *( "/" segment )
   path-empty    = 0<pchar>

   segment       = *pchar
   segment-nz    = 1*pchar
   segment-nz-nc = 1*( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / "@" )
                    ; non-zero-length segment without any colon ":"

   pchar         = unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"

   query         = *( pchar / "/" / "?" )

   fragment      = *( pchar / "/" / "?" )

   pct-encoded   = "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG

   unreserved    = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"
   reserved      = gen-delims / sub-delims
   gen-delims    = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "@"
   sub-delims    = "!" / "$" / "&" / "'" / "(" / ")"
                    / "*" / "+" / "," / ";" / "="

          Figure 1: ABNF Definition of URI Representation of a CRI

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 5]
Internet-Draft       CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri"       November 2026

3.  Security Considerations

   TODO Security

4.  IANA Considerations

   // RFC Editor: please replace RFC-XXXX with the RFC number of this
   // RFC, [IANA.concise-diagnostic-notation] with a reference to the
   // new registry group, and remove this note.

4.1.  Concise Diagnostic Notation App-extension Identifiers Registry

   IANA is requested to register the "cri" app-extension identifier as
   per Table 1 in the "App-Extension Identifiers" registry in the
   "Concise Diagnostic Notation" registry group [IANA.concise-
   diagnostic-notation], with the Change Controller "IETF".

      +===============+=====================+======================+
      | app-extension | Description         | Reference            |
      | identifier    |                     |                      |
      +===============+=====================+======================+
      | cri           | Constrained         | RFC-XXXX,            |
      |               | Resource Identifier | [I-D.ietf-core-href] |
      +---------------+---------------------+----------------------+

                 Table 1: app-extension Identifier "cri"

5.  Normative References

   [BCP14]    Best Current Practice 14,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp14>.
              At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following:

              Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

              Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

   [I-D.ietf-cbor-edn-literals]
              Bormann, C., "Concise Diagnostic Notation (CDN)", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-29,
              31 October 2026, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
              draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-29>.

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 6]
Internet-Draft       CBOR Diagnostic Notation: "cri"       November 2026

   [I-D.ietf-core-href]
              Bormann, C. and H. Birkholz, "Constrained Resource
              Identifiers", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
              ietf-core-href-30, 21 November 2025,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-core-
              href-30>.

   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
              RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986>.

   [RFC3987]  Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
              Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, DOI 10.17487/RFC3987,
              January 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3987>.

   [STD68]    Internet Standard 68,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std68>.
              At the time of writing, this STD comprises the following:

              Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
              Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.

   [STD94]    Internet Standard 94,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std94>.
              At the time of writing, this STD comprises the following:

              Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object
              Representation (CBOR)", STD 94, RFC 8949,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8949, December 2020,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8949>.

Acknowledgments

   TODO acknowledge.

Author's Address

   Carsten Bormann
   Universität Bremen TZI
   Postfach 330440
   D-28359 Bremen
   Germany
   Phone: +49-421-218-63921
   Email: cabo@tzi.org

Bormann                    Expires 6 May 2027                   [Page 7]