Use of Ethernet Control Word RECOMMENDED
draft-bryant-pals-ethernet-cw-01

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (pals WG)
Last updated 2017-09-05 (latest revision 2017-08-02)
Replaced by draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream WG state Adopted by a WG
Other - see Comment Log
Document shepherd Matthew Bocci
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bryant-pals-ethernet-cw-01.txt

Abstract

The pseudowire (PW) encapsulation of Ethernet, as defined in RFC4448, specifies that the use of the control word (CW) is optional. In the absence of the CW an Ethernet pseudowire packet can be misidentified as an IP packet by a label switching router (LSR). This in turn may lead to the selection of the wrong equal-cost-multi-path (ECMP) path for the packet, leading in turn to the mis-ordering of packets. This problem has become more serious due to the deployment of equipment with Ethernet MAC addresses that start with 0x4 or 0x6. The use of the Ethernet PW CW addresses this problem. This document recommends the use of the Ethernet pseudowire control word in all but exceptional circumstances. This document updates RFC4448.

Authors

Stewart Bryant (stewart.bryant@gmail.com)
Andrew Malis (agmalis@gmail.com)
Ignas Bagdonas (ibagdona.ietf@gmail.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)