Yang model for requesting Path Computation
draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-03
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (candidate for teas WG) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2017-10-24 (latest revision 2017-06-30) | ||||||
| Replaces | draft-busibel-ccamp-path-computation-api | ||||||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation | ||||||
| Stream | IETF | ||||||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||||||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||||||
| Yang Validation | ☯ 0 errors, 0 warnings. | ||||||
| Additional URLs |
|
||||||
| Stream | WG state | Call For Adoption By WG Issued | |||||
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||||||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation | |||||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||||||
| Telechat date | |||||||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||||||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||||||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-03.txt
Abstract
There are scenarios, typically in a hierarchical SDN context, in which an orchestrator may not have detailed information to be able to perform an end-to-end path computation and would need to request lower layer/domain controllers to calculate some (partial) feasible paths. Multiple protocol solutions can be used for communication between different controller hierarchical levels. This document assumes that the controllers are communicating using YANG-based protocols (e.g., NETCONF or RESTCONF). This document describes some use cases where a path computation request, via YANG-based protocols (e.g., NETCONF or RESTCONF), can be needed. This document also proposes a yang model for a stateless RPC which complements the stateful solution defined in [TE-TUNNEL].
Authors
Italo Busi
(italo.busi@huawei.com)
Sergio Belotti
(sergio.belotti@nokia.com)
Victor Lopezalvarez
(victor.lopezalvarez@telefonica.com)
Oscar de Dios
(oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com)
ansharma@infinera.com
(ansharma@infinera.com)
Yan Shi
(shiyan49@chinaunicom.cn)
Ricard Vilata
(ricard.vilalta@cttc.es)
Karthik Sethuraman
(karthik.sethuraman@necam.com)
Michael Scharf
(michael.scharf@nokia.com)
Daniele Ceccarelli
(daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)