Standard Primitives versus Transport Specific Adaptation
draft-carey-core-std-msg-vs-trans-adapt-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Tim Carey | ||
| Last updated | 2015-12-19 (Latest revision 2015-06-17) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft discusses the need for a consistent messaging layer that can be used but the transport protocols as they adapt to the CoAP Request/Response layer. In addition, this draft provides comments to the TCP transport implementaton described by [I-D.tschofenig-core-coap-tcp-tls].
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)