Interoperability Issues Between DMARC and Indirect Email Flows
draft-dmarc-interoperability-00
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(dmarc WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Franck Martin , Eliot Lear , Tim Draegen | ||
Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2015-01-19) | ||
Replaced by | draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Adopted for WG Info Only | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
DMARC introduces a mechanism for expressing domain-level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition, and reporting. The DMARC mechanism can encounter interoperability issues when messages originate from third party sources, are modified in transit, or are forwarded enroute to their final destination. Collectively these email flows are referred to as indirect email flows. This document describes interoperability issues between DMARC and indirect email flows. Possible methods for addressing interoperability issues are presented.
Authors
Franck Martin
Eliot Lear
Tim Draegen
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)