Programming Methodology Framework aka PMF
draft-dulaunoy-programming-methodology-framework-03
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Alexandre Dulaunoy , Andras Iklody | ||
| Last updated | 2026-05-30 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-dulaunoy-programming-methodology-framework-03
Network Working Group A. Dulaunoy
Internet-Draft A. Iklody
Intended status: Informational CIRCL
Expires: 1 December 2026 30 May 2026
Programming Methodology Framework aka PMF
draft-dulaunoy-programming-methodology-framework-03
Abstract
This document describes the Programming Methodology Framework, also
known as the PMF methodology. The methodology is based on the
manifesto written by Zed A. Shaw [PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO], which
describes a natural approach to software engineering with a strong
focus on the act of programming. The PMF methodology uses a neutral
name to provide a non-partisan reference for official engineering or
project documents describing one of the most widely used software
engineering methodologies.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 1 December 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Dulaunoy & Iklody Expires 1 December 2026 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft PMF - Programming Methodology Framework May 2026
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Management and PMF methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Swearwords and Software Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Conventions and Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1. Introduction
In 2011, Zed A. Shaw published a blog post which describes:
{align="left"} I think I'm going to create the ultimate software
development methodology. It'll be revolutionary compared to others
because it will focus on the one thing that gets software done. Its
entire focus will be this one, glorious, completely useful activity
for writing software. It's name even embodies the perfection of this
programming methodology.
The PMF methodology was later published as a manifesto
[PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO]. The manifesto clearly describes the
focus on programming as a way to avoid surrounding management
overhead and pivot towards software delivery.
[THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING] describes similar methodologies that
strongly focus on coding, scripting, and programming.
The overall concept of PMF methodology follows the following process:
* Compose a list of features to be implemented and use an iterative
programming process.
* Enhance said features using trial and error programming.
* Orchestrate your testing and integration processes using pragmatic
programming.
Repeat the above process until the software is delivered.
A simplified overview of the process can be described as follows:
Dulaunoy & Iklody Expires 1 December 2026 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft PMF - Programming Methodology Framework May 2026
+----------+
| |
| idea <------+
| | |
+----+-----+ |
| |
| |
+----v-----+ |
| | | it doesn't work
| code | |
| | |
+----+-----+ |
| |
| |
+----v-----+ |
| | |
| release +------+
| |
+----------+
The PMF methodology covers both open source and proprietary software
and can be used interchangeably in either context.
1.1. Management and PMF methodology
A simple management process is a requirement of the PMF methodology.
The management process is meant to complement, rather than interfere
with, the programming aspect, and it serves solely to support the PMF
methodology.
* Collect requirements of the users/customers.
* Provide programmers with the desired requirements.
* Review whether the software to be delivered matches the
requirements.
1.2. Swearwords and Software Engineering
PMF recognises that the vocabulary found in source code, comments,
commit messages, and adjacent engineering conversations can carry
useful information about how programmers experience the code they
maintain. Strehmel's empirical study of open-source C repositories
compared projects containing English swearwords with projects that
did not contain them and reported that the former set showed
significantly better adherence to coding standards under several
statistical tests [SWEARWORDS-CODE-QUALITY].
Dulaunoy & Iklody Expires 1 December 2026 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft PMF - Programming Methodology Framework May 2026
This observation is important for PMF because it treats apparently
informal programmer expression as a signal that can be studied rather
than dismissed. Swearwords can indicate emotional involvement,
frustration with unnecessary complexity, or unusually direct feedback
about code paths that deserve attention. In practical software
engineering, such signals can help teams identify confusing
interfaces, fragile components, and places where programmers have
invested enough attention to leave candid warnings for future
readers.
The correlation MUST NOT be interpreted as a recommendation to add
swearwords to source code to improve quality. PMF instead recommends
that teams preserve useful technical context, review emotionally
charged comments with empathy, and turn the underlying engineering
signal into tests, refactoring, documentation, or clearer interfaces.
1.3. Conventions and Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2. Security Considerations
Secure and defensive programming can only come from practicing
programming, and this also includes the act of simplifying or
removing code to reduce the attack surface.
3. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the programmers who program.
4. References
4.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
4.2. Informative References
[PROGRAMMING-MF-MANIFESTO]
Shaw, Z. A., "Programming Motherfucker, do you speak it?",
<http://programming-motherfucker.com>.
Dulaunoy & Iklody Expires 1 December 2026 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft PMF - Programming Methodology Framework May 2026
[SWEARWORDS-CODE-QUALITY]
Strehmel, J., "Is there a Correlation between the Use of
Swearwords and Code Quality in Open Source Code?", 2023,
<https://cme.h-its.org/exelixis/pubs/JanThesis.pdf>.
[THE-TAO-OF-PROGRAMMING]
James, G., "The Tao of Programming",
<http://www.mit.edu/~xela/tao.html>.
Authors' Addresses
Alexandre Dulaunoy
Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg
122, rue Adolphe Fischer
L-L-1521 Luxembourg
Luxembourg
Phone: +352 247 88444
Email: alexandre.dulaunoy@circl.lu
Andras Iklody
Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg
122, rue Adolphe Fischer
L-L-1521 Luxembourg
Luxembourg
Phone: +352 247 88444
Email: andras.iklody@circl.lu
Dulaunoy & Iklody Expires 1 December 2026 [Page 5]