Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags
draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-03
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (pce WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Adrian Farrel | ||
| Last updated | 2019-11-06 (latest revision 2019-10-31) | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 8786 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
plain text
xml
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | Hariharan Ananthakrishnan | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2019-09-23) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Deborah Brungard | ||
| Send notices to | Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com> | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-03.txt
Abstract
Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to support stateful Path Computation Elements (PCEs) are defined in RFC 8231. One of the extensions is the Stateful PCE Request Parameters (SRP) object. That object includes a Flags field that is a set of 32 bit flags, and RFC 8281 defines an IANA registry for tracking assigned flags. However, RFC 8231 does not explain how an implementation should set unassigned flags in transmitted messages, nor how an implementation should process unassigned, unknown, or unsupported flags in received messages. This document updates RFC 8231 by defining the correct behaviors.
Authors
Adrian Farrel (adrian@olddog.co.uk)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)