We Are All Individuals
draft-gondwana-we-are-all-individuals-01
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Bron Gondwana | ||
| Last updated | 2026-10-29 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-gondwana-we-are-all-individuals-01
Network Working Group B. Gondwana
Internet-Draft Fastmail
Intended status: Best Current Practice 29 October 2026
Expires: 2 May 2027
We Are All Individuals
draft-gondwana-we-are-all-individuals-01
Abstract
Participation in the IETF is by individuals. This document makes
that principle concrete for an environment in which software agents
can produce and submit text. Each Datatracker account belongs to one
human who has acknowledged the Note Well. Every IETF Contribution is
vouched for by one human who is accountable for it. Anonymous
Contributions are not accepted, and no human may use more than one
identity in the same piece of work. Reading the IETF's work remains
open to everyone, with no account or identification required.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 May 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. One Account per Human . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2. One Human per Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.3. Every Contribution Has an Accountable Human . . . . . . . 3
4. Anonymity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Reading Requires No Identity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Multiple Identities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Open Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Existing Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Appendix A. Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1. Introduction
The IETF has always said that its participants act as individuals.
The existing statements of this principle are collected in Section 7.
Those statements were written when every message to a mailing list
and every Internet-Draft was typed by a person. That is no longer a
safe assumption. Agents can now draft text, post to mailing lists,
open issues, and submit documents, and can do so at a volume no
person could.
This document doesn't restrict the tools people use. It states who
is responsible for what those tools produce.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
This document uses "Contribution", "Contributor", and "Participant"
as defined in [RFC8179] and [RFC5378].
Human: A natural person.
Account: A Datatracker account, and the credentials associated with
it.
Agent: Software that produces or submits text, or takes other
actions, on behalf of a human.
3. Requirements
3.1. One Account per Human
Each human participating in the IETF SHOULD have one Datatracker
account. Section 5 describes the limited case in which a human holds
more than one.
A human MAY associate multiple email addresses with their account.
Using different addresses for different affiliations, or for personal
and work use, is common and expected. Addresses on one account are
linked, and the IETF treats them as one participant.
3.2. One Human per Account
Each Datatracker account MUST belong to exactly one human. That
human MUST have acknowledged the Note Well [NOTEWELL].
An account MUST NOT be shared between people, and MUST NOT be
operated by an organization or a role in place of a named human.
3.3. Every Contribution Has an Accountable Human
Every Contribution MUST be vouched for by one human, who is
accountable for it as its Contributor.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
That human MAY use any tools, including agents, to prepare or submit
the Contribution. The obligations that apply to a Contributor,
including IPR disclosure under [RFC8179] and conduct under [RFC7154],
apply to the human who vouches for it. They apply in the same way
whether the human typed the text or an agent produced it.
4. Anonymity
This document uses "anonymous" and "pseudonym" as defined in
Section 3.3 of [RFC6973].
Anonymity has real value. People use it to take part in political
life where speaking under their own name would put them, their
families, or their jobs at risk. [RFC8280] treats anonymity as a
human rights consideration in protocol design for these reasons.
Anonymous participation is still incompatible with the IETF standards
process. The process depends on knowing which human made each
Contribution:
* A Contributor grants rights in their Contribution and makes
representations about it (Section 5 of [RFC5378]). A grant or a
representation from nobody in particular is worth nothing.
* IPR disclosure obligations attach to IPR that the Contributor
"reasonably and personally" knows of, including IPR held by their
employer or sponsor (Section 5.6 of [RFC8179]). Nobody can tell
whether that obligation has been met without knowing who the
Contributor is.
* Rough consensus is judged by chairs who read the discussion. If
one human can appear as several participants, the chairs can't
tell how much support or opposition there really is.
* The guidelines for conduct [RFC7154] and the moderation processes
[RFC9945] act on people. A sanction that can be escaped by
creating a new account has no effect.
* Affiliations "are often used for identification" (Section 3.2 of
[RFC9281]). Readers weigh an argument partly by knowing who is
making it and what interests they may have.
Every Contribution MUST therefore be attributable to an identified
human, as required by Section 3.2. The IETF does not accept
anonymous Contributions.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
4.1. Reading Requires No Identity
The requirements in this document apply to contributing. They do not
apply to reading.
The IETF's mission commits it to "making our documents, our WG
mailing lists, our attendance lists, and our meeting minutes publicly
available on the Internet" (Section 1 of [RFC3935]), and the
standards process requires a "publicly accessible record" of its
activities (Section 8 of [RFC2026]).
Anyone MUST be able to read Internet-Drafts, RFCs, mailing list
archives, issue trackers, meeting materials, minutes, and recordings
without an account, without logging in, and without identifying
themselves. Nothing in this document anticipates or requires a login
to read the IETF's work. A reader can stay anonymous. A contributor
can't.
The IETF already draws this line for meetings. Attending a session
has long been recorded: the blue sheets were "paper forms on which
everyone writes their name and their affiliation", and for remote
attendance "attendance is handled by accessing the application"
([RFC9592]). Today, entering a session means logging in to Meetecho,
and attendance lists are part of the public record (Section 1 of
[RFC3935]). The minutes, materials, and recordings of those sessions
are published for anyone to read without logging in. This document
applies the same split to every other way of taking part.
5. Multiple Identities
A human may want to take part in the IETF under an identity that is
not publicly linked to their existing account. Reasons include
changing employers, working in an area that is sensitive for their
employer or government, or separating personal and professional work.
A human MAY hold more than one account, each used for a different
piece of work, without publicly linking them. Each account is still
subject to every requirement in this document: it belongs to one
identified human who has acknowledged the Note Well, and that human
is accountable for every Contribution made from it.
A human MUST NOT use more than one identity to contribute to the same
piece of work. For the purposes of this document, a "piece of work"
includes at least:
* an Internet-Draft and any later document derived from it;
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
* any discussion, issue, review, or consensus call about such a
document; and
* any nomination, petition, or other process in which participants
are counted.
A human MUST NOT create a new account to avoid a sanction applied to
an existing one, or to avoid the history attached to it on an
existing topic.
6. Open Questions
This document is a starting point for discussion. These questions
are expected to be debated.
* Is a working group the right scope for a "piece of work", or is a
single document enough? Working group scope is easier to check,
but it may exclude people who have good reasons to keep two lines
of work apart.
* Should an account with no public link to a human's other accounts
still be linked privately, for example by disclosure to the IETF
Secretariat or the Ombudsteam? That would allow enforcement of
Section 5 without exposing the link publicly.
* Is a pseudonym acceptable on a single account, if the human behind
it is known to the IETF and accountable in the same way as anyone
else?
* How should the IETF verify that an account belongs to one human,
and how much verification is proportionate?
7. Existing Principle
The following documents state that participation in the IETF is by
individuals.
Section 3.2 of [RFC9281] (BCP 11):
For all purposes relevant to the Internet Standards development
process, membership in the IETF and its WGs is defined to be
established solely and entirely by individuals who participate in
IETF and WG activities. These individuals do not formally
represent any organizations they may be affiliated with, although
affiliations are often used for identification.
Section 1 of [RFC2418] (BCP 25):
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
There is no formal membership in the IETF. Participation is open
to all. [...] Participation is by individual technical
contributors, rather than by formal representatives of
organizations.
Section 5 of [RFC8179] (BCP 79):
This document refers to the IETF Participant making disclosures,
consistent with the general IETF philosophy that Participants in
the IETF act as individuals.
Section 1 of [RFC8179] defines a "Contributor" as "an individual
submitting a Contribution", and a "Participant" as "any individual
Participating in an IETF discussion or activity". Section 1 of
[RFC5378] (BCP 78) uses the same definition of "Contributor".
Section 2.2 of [RFC7241]:
All IETF participants act as individuals. There is no concept of
"IETF membership".
Section 4.1 of [RFC9680]:
While IETF participants are expected to participate as
individuals, their actions could still be construed as
representing their employer, whatever their role.
Section 2.1 of [RFC8718]:
Meeting attendees participate as individuals.
Appendix A.1 of [RFC6702] describes the IPR obligations as "personal
requirements applying to all IETF participants as individuals".
Section 5 of [RFC2026] notes that the IAB and IESG "are composed of
individuals who may participate, as individuals, in the technical
work of the IETF".
The final version of the Tao of the IETF, archived in [RFC9592], says
"There is no membership in the IETF."
The IRTF's code of conduct [RFC9775] says a generative tool must not
be listed as an author of a document, and that significant amounts of
AI-generated content must be disclosed.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
8. Security Considerations
TODO
9. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC2418] Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and
Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 2418, DOI 10.17487/RFC2418,
September 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2418>.
[RFC5378] Bradner, S., Ed. and J. Contreras, Ed., "Rights
Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust", BCP 78, RFC 5378,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5378, November 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5378>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8179] Bradner, S. and J. Contreras, "Intellectual Property
Rights in IETF Technology", BCP 79, RFC 8179,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8179, May 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179>.
[RFC9281] Salz, R., "Entities Involved in the IETF Standards
Process", BCP 11, RFC 9281, DOI 10.17487/RFC9281, June
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9281>.
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics]
Carpenter, B. E., "Principles and Guidelines for
Assignment of RFC Authorship", Work in Progress, Internet-
Draft, draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-06, 2 August
2026, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-
carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-06>.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
[I-D.fengfar-led]
Farrell, S. and C. Feng, "Dealing with LLMs in IETF
Discussions", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
fengfar-led-01, 6 August 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fengfar-led-
01>.
[I-D.ietf-procon-2026bis]
Salz, R. and S. O. Bradner, "The Internet Standards
Process", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
procon-2026bis-11, 1 July 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-procon-
2026bis-11>.
[I-D.ietf-procon-2418bis]
Salz, R., Schinazi, D., and S. O. Bradner, "IETF Working
Group Guidelines and Procedures", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-procon-2418bis-04, 17 August
2026, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-
procon-2418bis-04>.
[I-D.moonesamy-authorship-ietf]
Moonesamy, S., "Reflections on IETF Authorship", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-moonesamy-authorship-ietf-
00, 9 September 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-moonesamy-
authorship-ietf-00>.
[NOTEWELL] IETF, "Note Well", n.d.,
<https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/>.
[RFC2026] Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2026>.
[RFC3935] Alvestrand, H., "A Mission Statement for the IETF",
BCP 95, RFC 3935, DOI 10.17487/RFC3935, October 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3935>.
[RFC6702] Polk, T. and P. Saint-Andre, "Promoting Compliance with
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules",
RFC 6702, DOI 10.17487/RFC6702, August 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6702>.
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
[RFC6973] Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J.,
Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, "Privacy
Considerations for Internet Protocols", RFC 6973,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6973, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6973>.
[RFC7154] Moonesamy, S., Ed., "IETF Guidelines for Conduct", BCP 54,
RFC 7154, DOI 10.17487/RFC7154, March 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7154>.
[RFC7241] Dawkins, S., Thaler, P., Romascanu, D., and B. Aboba, Ed.,
"The IEEE 802/IETF Relationship", RFC 7241,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7241, July 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7241>.
[RFC8280] ten Oever, N. and C. Cath, "Research into Human Rights
Protocol Considerations", RFC 8280, DOI 10.17487/RFC8280,
October 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8280>.
[RFC8718] Lear, E., Ed., "IETF Plenary Meeting Venue Selection
Process", BCP 226, RFC 8718, DOI 10.17487/RFC8718,
February 2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8718>.
[RFC9592] ten Oever, N. and G. Wood, "Retiring the Tao of the IETF",
RFC 9592, DOI 10.17487/RFC9592, June 2024,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9592>.
[RFC9680] Halpern, J., Ed. and J. Daley, "Antitrust Guidelines for
IETF Participants", RFC 9680, DOI 10.17487/RFC9680,
October 2024, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9680>.
[RFC9775] Perkins, C. S., "IRTF Code of Conduct", RFC 9775,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9775, March 2025,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9775>.
[RFC9945] Eggert, L., Ed. and E. Lear, Ed., "IETF Community
Moderation", BCP 245, RFC 9945, DOI 10.17487/RFC9945,
February 2026, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9945>.
Appendix A. Related Work
RFC Editor: please remove this appendix before publication.
Other documents under discussion cover parts of the same ground:
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft All Individuals October 2026
* [I-D.fengfar-led] discusses the use of AI tools in IETF mailing
list discussions and recommends that the IETF develop guidelines
for them. It notes that the sock-puppet problem is a separate
issue. This document addresses that issue.
* [I-D.carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics] states that authors remain
entirely responsible for any content generated by AI, and that an
AI tool must not be credited as an author. This document applies
the same principle to every Contribution, not only to RFC
authorship.
* [I-D.moonesamy-authorship-ietf] reflects on authorship in the IETF
and asks whether the IETF should set guidelines for the use of
generative AI by authors.
Some documents cited here are being revised.
[I-D.ietf-procon-2418bis] would replace [RFC2418] and keeps the text
quoted in Section 7. [I-D.ietf-procon-2026bis] would replace
[RFC2026]. References will be updated if those documents are
published first.
Acknowledgments
TODO
Author's Address
Bron Gondwana
Fastmail
Email: brong@fastmailteam.com
Gondwana Expires 2 May 2027 [Page 11]