Welcome to the IETF
draft-gondwana-welcome-to-the-ietf-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Bron Gondwana | ||
| Last updated | 2026-08-21 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-gondwana-welcome-to-the-ietf-00
Network Working Group B. Gondwana
Internet-Draft Fastmail
Intended status: Informational 21 August 2026
Expires: 22 February 2027
Welcome to the IETF
draft-gondwana-welcome-to-the-ietf-00
Abstract
The IETF has produced many documents to describe what it is and how
it works -- this is one of them.
In an age in which agentic tooling makes it trivially easy to produce
large amounts of text, this document explains to both humans and
agents what the IETF is about, how to succeed at the IETF, and some
common pitfalls which might reduce the quality of your time here.
This document does not describe the specific arcane process of how
documents progress through adoption, improvement, consensus, editing,
and eventual publication. Instead, we focus on the people and the
culture of the IETF and how to succeed at IETFing.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 22 February 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Who even is the IETF? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Why would you come to the IETF? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3. Why wouldn't you come to the IETF? . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.4. Quality takes time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.5. Most of the work is not glamorous . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.6. How decisions get made . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.7. The IETF has a culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.8. Everything here is on the record . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.9. A note on agents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.10. Still here? Good! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.11. Where to begin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1. Introduction
This document is aimed at somebody who has not yet engaged with the
IETF, or is early in their IETF journey. Welcome!
By the time you have finished reading this, you should have a clear
idea of whether the IETF is the right place for you, and whether you
are likely to add value to the IETF's mission.
This is a simplified, high level overview. There are many other
resources to read to understand more detail, but this will get you
started.
1.1. Who even is the IETF?
The IETF -- the Internet Engineering Task Force -- is the open,
international organisation that develops the voluntary technical
standards the Internet is built on. It works by the consensus of the
people who turn up to do the work, and everything it produces is
freely available for anyone to read and implement.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
The IETF's output is documents called RFCs (Request for Comments).
There have been over 10,000 of them already. These documents
describe how the Internet works, and also how the IETF itself works.
RFCs have value because they are good, well written, technically
sound documents. They are good because of the hard work of people
like you.
The IETF's mission is defined in [RFC3935] as "to produce high
quality, relevant technical and engineering documents that influence
the way people design, use, and manage the Internet in such a way as
to make the Internet work better". Famously, we're not the Internet
police. Our documents have so much influence by persuasion and
demonstrated value. People trust that if they implement a protocol
defined in an RFC, it will work reliably and be secure. Because
others trust that too, they implement the same RFC, and their systems
can then interoperate with each other.
The IETF is also people. Quite a lot of people. We meet in person 3
times per year, about 1000 of us, and there are many more who attend
remotely or engage with the IETF via email on our mailing lists.
Almost all of these people are volunteers, giving their own time or
sponsored by their employers, and applying their judgement and energy
towards making the Internet better.
It isn't run entirely by volunteers, though. The IETF is also
supported by paid staff and consultants who run the tooling and
machinery, including professional editors who keep the quality of the
documents high.
Most of the IETF's work happens in working groups. Each one is
chartered to tackle a specific problem area -- things like routing,
email, or security -- and in practice a working group is really just
a mailing list with a couple of chairs to keep it focused and moving.
When you engage with the IETF, most of the time you're engaging with
a working group.
Crucially, there's no membership. No fees to join, no application to
fill in, and no gatekeeper who decides whether you belong. You
participate by participating. Almost all of the work happens in the
open on public mailing lists, and the archives are there for anyone
to read. If you're reading this, you're already as entitled to take
part as anyone else.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
1.2. Why would you come to the IETF?
Everybody has their own reasons, but frequently you come because you
have a problem and you want to change something about how the
Internet works to solve that problem. Further, you probably need
others to make changes to how they do things as well, so you can
interoperate with them!
Most people come to the IETF with a goal. Those who are most
successful come with a compelling problem that needs solving. Maybe
you also have a sketch of a possible solution, but the real value of
the IETF is the people, and what they bring to your problem: insight,
hard-won experience, and good taste.
A lot of that experience is about making good tradeoffs, and the
hardest tradeoff is almost always compatibility. The installed base
of software that already implements the existing specs is large,
messy, and buggy, and it won't upgrade on your schedule. Making a
change that solves your problem without breaking all of that is a
genuine skill, and it's one the IETF has in depth. The solution the
IETF settles on may look very different from your initial idea.
1.3. Why wouldn't you come to the IETF?
It costs quite a lot of many people's time to generate an RFC. Take
the publicly available figures for what it costs to run the IETF and
the time participants put in, divide by the number of RFCs produced
in a year, and you land somewhere around USD $100,000 for an average
one. Large, complex documents easily cost into the millions.
For that level of investment, it wants to be something with a wide
applicability, that will positively affect the lives of many people,
and stands a chance of being implemented.
If you come to the IETF with an idea, one of the first questions is
going to be "who would use this, and are they interested in it?". If
your presentation looks like a marketing blitz and is about why your
idea is going to be good for you, that won't go over well. If you
describe why your idea is good for the Internet, and how it fits in
without disrupting everything else, that will do better.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
1.4. Quality takes time
Collaboration is slower than you might expect, and you're relying on
other people's time. Everybody already has plenty of their own ideas
about what would make the Internet better, so you need to show them
that you care about their priorities too -- and that you have sound
technical judgement. If you are generous with your time, reviewing
and assisting others, they will repay you in kind.
The average RFC takes over 3 years from beginning to end. Drafts
whose proponent disappears before they are finished are a lot less
likely to complete the journey. Somebody has to care about the
problem enough to keep it moving, and if you brought the idea to the
IETF in the first place, that somebody is probably you.
The oldest RFC is more than 50 years old now. These documents are
the foundation of the Internet. Foundations take a long time to
build, but they also last a long time.
1.5. Most of the work is not glamorous
It's great to get your name on an RFC. Having a published RFC is
very valuable to people's careers.
Not every RFC is a headline protocol with its own name and press
release. Most are the careful, slow, painstaking work of defining
the edge cases and error handling that make everything reliable in a
chaotic world.
But many people are addicted to this organisation! The IETF is full
of people who really care about doing good work. If you bring that
energy, you will be very much welcomed. Many people change jobs, and
continue coming to the IETF. As they become more senior,
participation at the IETF becomes a non-optional part of their
contract negotiations. You'll get to work with smart, like-minded
people and make lifelong friends -- relationships that last even
longer than it takes to realise the mistakes you made in your first
RFC and go back and replace it with a newer one.
1.6. How decisions get made
The IETF doesn't vote. Participants speak for themselves as
individuals, not on behalf of their employers, so counting hands
would be close to meaningless -- it would just reward whoever dragged
the most colleagues along to the room.
The way the IETF describes itself is "rough consensus and running
code". Both halves matter.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
Rough consensus is how we decide. A chair listens to the discussion
and judges where the group has landed. A proposal moves ahead once
the objections have been heard, understood, and either dealt with or
shown to be wrong. An objection with real technical merit behind it
has to be engaged with; you can't paper over it by being more
numerous. In a meeting you'll sometimes hear a chair ask the room to
hum. It's a deliberately fuzzy way to gauge the mood, and it works
well enough.
Running code is the other half. We have a deep respect for things
that actually work. Show two independent implementations talking to
each other and you've made an argument that's very hard to beat with
words alone. That's a big part of why we run a Hackathon at every
meeting.
So the currency here is persuasion and demonstration. Nobody gets to
pull rank.
1.7. The IETF has a culture
This organisation has existed for decades. It produces a ton of
highly influential documents. It's not perfect, but it is very
successful. It does have a reputation of being hard to get started
in, some of which is legitimately earned and some of which is people
wanting it to be something it isn't.
To be involved in the IETF, you need to fit in with the culture that
makes it work. Take the time to observe and understand, see what
works and what doesn't. Some people at the IETF you will admire and
be impressed at their ideas and behaviours. Some you will observe
and think "I wouldn't take that approach". Be unafraid to help
improve things, while humble enough to realise there might be value
you have not yet understood in how things are currently done.
1.8. Everything here is on the record
The flip side of all that openness is that everything you say is
public and kept forever. Posts to the mailing lists, comments at the
microphone, the drafts you submit -- all of it is archived and
searchable, and it isn't going away. Write accordingly.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
Two things are worth knowing before you contribute. The first is the
"Note Well": by taking part you agree that your contributions can be
published and freely used, and you take on an obligation to disclose
patents you know about that would be needed to implement what's being
discussed. That's a simplified summary -- the actual Note Well text,
and the policies it points to, are what bind you. You'll see it
referenced at the start of every meeting and on every mailing list.
Read it once so it doesn't surprise you later.
The second is that the IETF has a code of conduct and an anti-
harassment policy, and they're taken seriously. Argue hard about the
technical questions -- that's the whole point of being here -- while
treating the people on the other side of the argument well. Attack
the argument and leave the person alone. Behave well and you'll
never need to become intimately familiar with the penalties in the
code of conduct, the Ombudsteam, or the list moderators.
1.9. A note on agents
It has never been easier to produce a plausible-looking draft. An
LLM will happily generate a hundred pages of correctly-formatted
protocol text overnight, full of confident RFC 2119 keywords.
Writing the text was never the hard part. The hard part is caring
about a problem for three years, showing up to defend the work,
reading other people's drafts as carefully as you'd want yours read,
getting two implementations to actually interoperate, and persuading
a room full of sceptical experts that your idea earns its place in
the Internet. Those are the things that turn an idea into a
standard, and a tool can't do them for you.
Use whatever helps you think and write more clearly. But remember
that every draft costs other people their time to read. If you send
text that no human has read, understood, and is willing to stand
behind, you're spending expensive volunteer attention to do the work
you skipped -- and people here can tell. Own what you submit.
The norms around all this are still being worked out, but some
guidance already exists. The IRTF's code of conduct ([RFC9775]) says
a generative tool must not be listed as an author of a document, and
that significant amounts of AI-generated content must be disclosed.
Whichever tools you use, the accountability stays with you.
1.10. Still here? Good!
Bring problems, then help iterate towards solutions. If this sounds
like something you want to do, then the IETF wants you.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
Once your idea has been adopted by the IETF, it becomes the IETF's
idea. You have as much say, and also as little say, as everybody
else in the eventual outcome. Your influence will be proportional to
the quality of your ideas, and your ability to persuade.
Persuasion happens both in person, and online - so hone your ability
to communicate well in both settings, and build relationships such
that when you need something from some other volunteer, they will be
inclined to make the effort.
Clear writing is a big part of this. The easier your ideas are to
read, and the more carefully you choose your terminology, the more
persuasive you'll be -- and the less of everyone's time you'll spend
untangling what you actually meant.
1.11. Where to begin
If you've read this far and you're keen, the on-ramp is smaller than
the IETF's reputation suggests. Find the working group whose problem
space is closest to yours, subscribe to its mailing list, and read
for a while to get a feel for how the group talks and what it cares
about. Read the drafts it's working on. Come to a meeting, in
person or online, and introduce yourself.
Introduce yourself to the working group chairs, or the area directors
responsible for the area you care about, and ask them how you can
help. Offering to review a document or take on a small piece of work
is one of the fastest ways to become known and trusted -- the kind of
generosity that gets repaid later.
You don't have to do this alone. The IETF runs sessions for new
participants at every meeting, and there's a mentoring programme that
will pair you with someone experienced. Plenty of people are happy
to be asked a "dumb" question; most of us were new once, and someone
helped us. The official guides at https://www.ietf.org/about/
(https://www.ietf.org/about/) go into the practical detail this
document deliberately skips.
2. Informative References
[RFC3935] Alvestrand, H., "A Mission Statement for the IETF",
BCP 95, RFC 3935, DOI 10.17487/RFC3935, October 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3935>.
[RFC9775] Perkins, C. S., "IRTF Code of Conduct", RFC 9775,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9775, March 2025,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9775>.
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft IETF Guide August 2026
Author's Address
Bron Gondwana
Fastmail
Email: brong@fastmailteam.com
Gondwana Expires 22 February 2027 [Page 9]