Examples of the 'XML2RFC' Version 2 and 3 Vocabularies
draft-hoffman-rfcexamples-04
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2016-05-06 (latest revision 2015-11-03) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffman-rfcexamples-04.txt
Abstract
This document gives examples of use of the "XML2RFC" vocabulary. The examples cover both version 2 and version 3. The purposes of this draft is to give developers of tools that process v2 and/or v3 documents a corpus to test against. Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) Discussion of this draft takes place on the rfc-interest mailing list (rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org), which has its home page at <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>.
Authors
Paul Hoffman
(paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Tony Hansen
(tony+rfcv3@maillennium.att.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)