Skip to main content

MoWIE for Network Aware Application

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Authors Wei Huang , Yunfei Zhang , Richard Yang , Chunshan Xiong , Yixue Lei , Yunbo Han , Gang Li
Last updated 2020-03-09
RFC stream (None)
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
ALTO                                                          W. Huang
Internet Draft                                                Y. Zhang
Intended status: Proposed Standard                             Tencent
Expires: September 2020                                         R.Yang
                                                       Yale University
                                                              C. Xiong
                                                                Y. Lei
                                                                Y. Han
                                                                 G. Li
                                                         March 10, 2020

                MoWIE for Network Aware Application


   With the quick deployment of 5G networks in the world, cloud based
   interactive services such as clouding gaming have gained substantial
   attention and are regarded as potential killer applications. To
   ensure users' quality of experience (QoE), a cloud interactive
   service may require not only high bandwidth (e.g., high-resolution
   media transmission) but also low delay (e.g., low latency and low
   lagging). However, the bandwidth and delay experienced by a mobile
   and wireless user can be dynamic, as a function of many factors, and
   unhandled changes can substantially compromise users' QoE. In this
   document, we investigate network-aware applications (NAA), which
   realize cloud based interactive services with improved QoE, by
   efficient utilization of Mobile and Wireless Information Exposure
   (MoWIE) . In particular, this document demonstrates, through
   realistic evaluations, that mobile network information such as MCS
   (Modulation and Coding Scheme) can effectively expose the dynamicity
   of the underlying network and can be made available to applications
   through MoWIE; using such information, the applications can then
   adapt key control knobs such as media codec scheme, encapsulation
   and application logical function to minimize QoE deduction. Based on
   the evaluations, we discuss how MoWIE can be a systematic extension
   of the ALTO protocol, to expose more lower-layer and finer grain
   network dynamics.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 1]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with
   the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-

   The list of current Internet-Drafts is at

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
   months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents
   at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at

Copyright and License Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   ( in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
   respect to this document. Please review these documents carefully,
   as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this
   document. Code Components extracted from this document must include
   Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 2]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in
   the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents
   1. Introduction of Network-aware Applications.................... 3
   2. Use Cases of Network-Aware Application (NAA).................. 4
     2.1. Cloud Gaming.............................................. 5
     2.2. Low Delay Live Show....................................... 5
     2.3. Cloud VR.................................................. 5
     2.4. Performance Requirements of these Use Cases............... 6
   3. Current (Indirect) Technologies on NAA........................ 6
     3.1. Video Compression Based on ROI (Region of Interest)....... 7
     3.2. AI-based Adaptive Bitrate................................. 7
   4. Preliminary Improvement Based on MoWIE........................ 9
     4.1. ROI Detection with Network Information.................... 9
     4.2. Adaptive Bitrate with Network Capability Exposure........ 13
     4.3. Analysis of the Experiments.............................. 15
   5. Standardization Considerations of MoWIE as an Extension to ALTO16
   6. Security Considerations...................................... 18
   7. References................................................... 18
     7.1. Normative References..................................... 18
     7.2. Informative References................................... 19
   Authors' Addresses.............................................. 20

1. Introduction of Network-aware Applications

   With the quick and widely deployment of 5G network in the world,
   more and more applications are now moving to the remote cloud-based
   application, e.g., cloud office, cloud education and cloud gaming.
   Some new and amazing applications are created and hosted in the
   remote cloud, e.g., cloud AR/VR/MR. What's more a lot of traditional
   niche interactive applications are becoming widely used in daily
   business with the help of 5G and cloud, e.g., cloud video
   conference. Take AAA cloud gaming which needs a lot of CPU and GPU
   for example, the edge cloud (e.g., MEC in 5G)performs the media
   rendering and mixing and only provides the processed media stream to
   the client, and the slim client only need to decode and display the
   visual content with imperceptible delay introduced by 5G network.
   The player feels just like executing all tasks in the client as
   before. To provide acceptable QoE to the end users, the cloud

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 3]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   application needs to know the network status, e.g., delay,
   bandwidth, jitter to dynamically balance the generated media traffic
   and the rendering/mixing in the cloud.

   Currently, the application assumes the network as a black box and
   continuously uses client or server measurement to detect the network
   characteristics, and then adaptively change the parameters as well as
   logical function of the application. However, these application layer
   mechanisms may work very well in some networks but do not work well
   in other networks, e.g., the cellular network. A lot of re-buffering
   and reconnection makes the QoE even worse, e.g., some pictures are
   blurry, and some pictures are skipped.

   Mobile network is always pursuing standard solutions to get network
   dynamic indicators that can be used by applications step by step. In
   3GPP, the ECN has been supported by the 4G radio station (eNB) to
   provide congestion information to the IMS application to perform the
   Adaptive Bitrate (ABR) [TS26.114].

   DASH [MPEG DASH] is a MPEG standard widely used to detect the
   throughput of the network based on the current throughput and
   buffering states and adaptively select the next segment of video
   streaming with a suitable bitrate in order to avoid the re-buffering.
   If the network can provide more information such as the guaranteed
   throughput to the application, the better bitrate will be selected by

   In 5G cellular networks, network capability exposure has been
   specified which allows the 5G system to expose the user device
   location, network status towards the 3rd party application servers
   modeled as AF (Application Function) [TS23.501]. However, this only
   works for 5G access and core network, which cannot cover the whole
   end-to-end network. How to enable the application to be aware of the
   lower layer networks in Internet scenario is an important area for
   both industrial and academic researchers.

2. Use Cases of Network-Aware Application (NAA)

   There are three typical NAAs, cloud gaming, low delay live show, and
   cloud VR, whose QoE can be largely enhanced with the help of MoWIE.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 4]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

2.1. Cloud Gaming

   As mentioned above, cloud gaming becomes more and more popular
   recently. This kind of games requires low latency and highly reliable
   transmission of motion tracking data from user to gaming server in
   the cloud, as well as low latency and high data rate transmission of
   processed visual content from gaming server cloud to the user
   devices. Cloud gaming is regarded as one major killer application as
   well as traffic contributor to wireless and cellular networks
   including 5G. The major advantages of cloud gaming are easy & quick
   starting (no/less need to download and install big volume of software
   in the user device), less cost and process load in user device and it
   is also regarded as anti-cheating measure. Thus, the kind of gaming
   becomes a competitive replacement for console gaming using cheaper PC
   or laptop. In order to support high quality cloud gaming services,
   the application need to get the information from the network layer,
   e.g., the data rate value or range which lower layer can provide in
   order to perform rendering and encoding, during which the application
   in the cloud can adopt different parameters to adjust the size of
   produced visual content within a time period.

2.2. Low Delay Live Show

   In 2019, over 500 million active users were using online personal
   live show services in China and there are 4 million simultaneous
   online audience watching a celebrity's show. Low delay live show
   requires the close interaction between application and network.
   Compared with conventional broadcast services. This service is
   interactive which means the audience can be involved and they are
   able to provide feedback to the anchor. For example, a gaming show
   broadcasts the gaming playing to all audience, and it also requires
   playing game interaction between the anchor and the audience. A delay
   lower than 100ms is desired. If the delay is too large, there will be
   undesirable degradation on user experiences especially in a large-
   scale show. To lower the latency and provide size-adjustable show
   content, the application also requires the real-time lower layer

2.3. Cloud VR

   Cloud VR data volume is large which is related to different parameter
   settings like DoF (Degree of Freedom), resolution and adopted
   rendering and compression algorithm. The rendering can be performed

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 5]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   at the cloud/network side or a mix of the cloud and the user device
   side. Because the latency in cloud VR is even as low as 20ms, the
   application may need to interact with network to get the information
   about the segmentation or transport block information, and these
   lower layers information may be dependent on different layer 2 and
   layer 3 wireless protocol designs.

2.4. Performance Requirements of these Use Cases

   There are different bandwidth, latency and lagging requirements for
   the above services which are characterized as parameter range.  The
   reason of using a range is because such requirements are related to a
   group of parameter settings including resolution, frame rate and the
   compression mechanism. We consider 1080p~4K as the resolution range,
   60-120 FPS (Frames per second) as the frame rate and H.265 as an
   example compression algorithm.  The end-to-end latency requirement is
   not only related to FPS but also the property of the service, i.e.,
   for weak interactive and strong interactive services [GSMA].

   With the typical parameters setting, cloud gaming generally needs a
   bandwidth of 20~60 Mbps and an end to end delay of 30~70ms. In cloud
   gaming, we consider the lagging happens when the latency is larger
   than 200ms. In order to avoid bad user experiences, the lagging rate
   is better to be as low as zero (in an optimal QoE). For low latency
   live show, 20~50 Mbps bandwidth may be needed and the end-to-end
   latency requirements is less than 100 ms.  Cloud VR service generally
   requires 100~500 Mbps bandwidth and 20~50 ms end-to-end latency. It
   is noted that these values are dependent with the parameter settings
   and they are provided to illustrate the order of magnitude of these
   parameters for the afore-mentioned use cases.  These value range may
   be updated according to specific scenarios and requirements.

3. Current (Indirect) Technologies on NAA

   There are a lot of technologies on NAA, such as buffer control
   method, adaptive bit rate method and so on. However, this document
   focuses on two novel approaches, which have achieved good performance
   in practice. One is video encoding based on ROI, the other is
   reinforcement learning based adaptive bitrate.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 6]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

3.1. Video Compression Based on ROI (Region of Interest)

   A foveated mechanism [Saccadic] in the Human Visual System (HVS)
   indicates that only small fovea region captures most visual attention
   at high resolution, while other peripheral regions receive little
   attention at low resolution. And we call those regions which attract
   users most, the regions of interest (ROI).

   To predict human attention or ROI, saliency detection has been widely
   studied in recent years [Borji], with a lot of applications in object
   recognition, object segmentation, action recognition, image caption,
   image/video compression, etc.

   Since there exists the region of interest in a video, the cloud
   server can give the ROI region higher rate while making other regions
   a lower rate. As a result, the whole rate of the video is reduced
   while the watching experience will not be harmed.

   This method means to detect the ROI and re-allocate the coding scheme
   for interested and non-interested regions in order to save the
   bandwidth without sacrificing user's QoE. In recent years, the ever-
   increasing video size has become a big problem to applications. The
   data rate of a cloud gaming video in 1080P can reach 25Mbps, which
   brings huge burden to the network, even for 5G network. Those ROI-
   based video compression methods are mainly applied to the high
   concurrency network to relive the burden of networks and then keep
   QoE in an acceptable range.

   However, current methods utilize application information like
   application rate and application buffer size as the indicators to
   roughly adjust the algorithm in interactive video services. That
   information is hard to reflect the real-time network status
   precisely. Therefore, it is hard to balance the QoE and bandwidth
   saving in real-time scenario. More direct information is helpful for
   those ROI methods to improve the performance.

3.2. AI-based Adaptive Bitrate

   This method intends to reduce lagging and ensure the acceptable
   picture quality.

   Applications such as video live streaming and cloud gaming employ
   adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms to optimize user QoE [MPC][ CS2P].

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 7]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   Despite the abundance of recently proposed schemes, state-of-the-art
   AI based ABR algorithms suffer from a key limitation. They use fixed
   control rules based on simplified or inaccurate models of the
   deployment environment. As a result, existing schemes inevitably fail
   to achieve optimal performance across a broad set of network
   conditions and QoE objectives.

   A reinforcement learning based ABR algorithm named Pensieve was
   proposed [Fahad] recently. Unlike traditional ABR algorithms that use
   fixed heuristics or inaccurate system models, Pensieve's ABR
   algorithms are generated using observations of the resulting
   performance of past decisions across a large number of video
   streaming experiments. This allows Pensieve to optimize its policy
   for different network characteristics and QoE metrics directly from
   experience. Over a broad set of network conditions and QoE metrics,
   it has been proven that Pensieve outperformed existing ABR algorithms
   by 12%~25%.

   For this method and those methods built upon this, it has been proven
   that all the information, such as rate, download time, buffer size or
   network level information which can reflect the performance are
   useful to the reinforcement learning [Hongzi2]. Since those data can
   reflect the network dynamics, they have been used to help the
   applications to know how to change the rate and promote the users'

   However, all these data are obtained from the client side or the
   server side. In reality, it is not easy to obtain such data in an
   effective and efficient way. Lacking of standardized approach to
   acquire these data, is difficult to make this usable for different
   applications for large scale deployment. Meanwhile, these data which
   reflect the real-time network status change rapidly and randomly
   which is hard to use a theoretical model to characterize.

   To summarize, current practices can make some improvements by
   indirectly measuring network status and react in the application.
   However, the network status data is not rich, direct, real-time, and
   also lacks of predictability, especially when in the mobile and
   wireless network scenarios, which results in long react delay or high
   QoE fluctuations.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 8]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

4. Preliminary Improvement Based on MoWIE

   Different from traditional video streaming, cloud gaming has no
   buffer to accommodate and re-arrange the received data. It must
   display the stream once the stream is received. Any late stream is of
   no use for the player. Cloud gaming performs not well in the existing
   public 4G network according to our actual measurements. The end to
   end delay is often greater than 100ms for a gaming client in Shenzhen
   to a gaming server in Shanghai, coupled with the codec delay. Here
   the delay is defined as the total delay from the user's operation
   instruction to show the response picture on user's screen.

   Once the network fluctuates, users will experience a longer delay.
   The poor user experience is not only because of the relative low
   network throughput, but also because the server cannot adapt the
   application logical policies (e.g. codec scheme and data bitrate).

   The popularity of 4K and even higher resolution and increasing FPS
   for cloud gaming and AR/VR services require both high bandwidth and
   low latency in wireless and cellular networks. The increasing
   resolution would incur a higher encoding and decoding delay. However,
   users' tolerance to delay will not increase with the resolution,
   which means the application needs to adapt to the network dynamics in
   a more efficient way. The higher resolution, the larger range of the
   rate adaptation can be used.

   In this section, we make experiments based on the methods described
   in section 3 to improve the QoE of cloud gaming. The performance
   between network-aware and native non-network-aware mechanisms are

4.1. ROI Detection with Network Information

   The first experiment is based on the ROI detection. We will
   investigate the impact of network perception.

   Saliency detection method has successfully reduced the size of videos
   and improve the QoE of users in video downloading [Saliency].
   However, it is not effective when applied to real-time interactive
   streaming such as cloud gaming.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 9]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   As we know, more accurate saliency region detection algorithm needs
   more time to obtain the result. However, when the users are suffering
   a bad performance network in cloud gaming, this precise detection may
   incur more delay to the system. As a result, it will harm the final

   If the application can learn the network well in a real-time manner,
   it can choose the algorithm based on how much delay the system can
   tolerate. If the network condition is good enough, it can adopt an
   algorithm which has deeper learning network and the added delay will
   not be perceived by the end users. Thus, it can save huge bandwidth
   without harming the QoE. On the other side, in a network with bad
   condition, the server can use the fastest method to avoid extra

   We make the experiments to show how the network information will
   influence the total QoE and bandwidth saving in ROI detection.

   The following 4 methods are compared:

   1) The original video, without using ROI method. This acts as a

   2) Quick saliency detection and encoding method, which is not
   accuracy in some cases. It only brings 10ms delay [Minbarrier].

   3) A relative accuracy saliency detection method. In general, if an
   algorithm is more precise, it will take more time to get the results.
   And the complexity of the picture will also influence the detection
   time and accuracy. Based on our test video, we adopt the method which
   brings delay about 40~70ms [LSTM].

   4) The application server in the cloud has the current bandwidth
   information which derived from the wireless LAN NIC. Here it is a
   simulation that all the collected bandwidth traces are already known
   by the server. Thus, it can use the bandwidth traces to compute
   transmission delay. Then the server can change the saliency detection
   algorithm based on this information and then encode the video.
   Although the result of future bandwidth prediction is not always
   accurate in real environment, the assumption here will not influence
   the final results much. Since in cloud gaming the server encodes the
   stream based on ROI information frame by frame instead of in a grain
   of chunks, the future bandwidth prediction window size doesn't have

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 10]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   to be long. Therefore, even the server can only get the bandwidth or
   delay prediction for a short time window, the server can still use
   this method with network information.

   Test environment:

   A 720P game video segment with a rate of 6.8Mbps. This is not a very
   high bandwidth requirement example in cloud gaming. We just show how
   it will benefit from MoWIE. High bandwidth requirement case will
   benefit more if the bandwidth fluctuates much.

   The three different networks are all wireless networks and the
   available bandwidth is varied frequently, where

   Network 1: The overall network condition is not very good, the
   average network bandwidth is 7.1Mbps, but it continues to fluctuate,
   and the minimum is only 3.9Mbps.

   Network 2: The overall network condition is good, with an average
   network bandwidth of 12Mbps and a minimum of 6.4Mbps.

   Network 3: The network fluctuates dramatically, with an average
   network bandwidth of 8.4Mbps and a minimum network bandwidth of

   Test content:

   The four methods are conducted on the original video under each three
   networks. After re-encoding based on the saliency detection, we
   calculate the new QoE and the saved bandwidth. The results are shown
   in the Figure 4-1:

   The QoE value is the MOS as standardized in the ITU.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 11]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   |   |    Network 1    |    Network 2    |    Network 3    |
   |   |QoE|  BW Saving  |QoE|  BW Saving  |QoE|  BW Saving  |
   | 1 |3.8|      0      |4.8|      0      |4.3|     0       |
   | 2 |3.8|     5%      |4.8|     9%      |4.3|    7%       |
   | 3 |2.2|    2.1%     |4.6|     38%     |3.1|    34%      |
   | 4 |3.6|     9%      |4.7|     33%     |4.3|    25%      |
        Figure 4-1: QoE and Bandwidth Saving


   It can be seen that the methods such as method 2 and method 3 that do
   not rely on the network information directly, have certain

   Though the method 2 is simple and time-consuming, it can only detect
   a small part of region of interest accurately. Thus, even if the
   network condition is very good, it can only save a small amount of
   bandwidth, and sometimes there are some incorrect ROI detection. The
   QoE will be reduced without hitting the ROI region.

   For Method 3, the algorithm is complicated, and it can correctly
   detect the user's area of interest, so that it can re-allocate
   encoding scheme and save a lot of bandwidth. However, its algorithm
   will introduce higher delay. When the user network condition is poor,
   the extra delay will cause even worst user's QoE. Although the
   bandwidth is saved, it affects the user experience seriously.

   Method 4 is based on the application's awareness of the network. If
   the application can know certain network information, it can balance
   the complexity of the algorithm (introducing delay) and the accuracy
   of the algorithm (saving bandwidth) according to the actual network
   conditions. As can be seen from the experiment, method 4 can ensure
   the user's QoE and save the bandwidth greatly at the same time.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 12]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

4.2. Adaptive Bitrate with Network Capability Exposure

   This experiment is AI-based rate adaption by utilizing the network
   information provided by the cellular base station (eNB) in cellular

   Tencent has launched real network testing of NAA-enabled cloud gaming
   in China Mobile LTE network, with the enhancement in eNB supporting
   base station information exposure.

   To enable the NAA mechanism, some cellular network information from
   eNBs are collected in an adaptive interval based on the change rate
   of network status. There information is categorized in two levels,
   i.e., cell level and UE level. Cell level information are common for
   all the UEs under a serving LTE cell and UE level information is
   specific for different UEs. 3GPP LTE specifications have specified
   how the PDCP (Packet Data Convergence Protocol), RLC (Radio Link
   Control), MAC (Medium Access Control) and PHY (Physical) protocols
   operate and this information are very essential statistics from these
   protocol layers.

   It is noted that in NAA mechanism, as the network information is from
   eNB, and the eNB has the real-time information of radio link quality
   statistics and layer 1 and layer 2 operation information, NAA
   mechanism can expose rich information to upper layer, e.g., it is
   capable to differentiate packet loss and congestion, which is very
   helpful to the applications in practice.

   The collected cell level information is:

   -  DLOccupyPRBNum: The number of Downlink PRBs(Physical Resource
   Block) occupied during sampling
   -  CellDLMACRate: The Downlink MAC data rate per cell

   UE level information includes:

   -  ULSINR: The Uplink SINR (Signal to Inference plus Noise Ratio)
   -  MCS: The index of MCS (Modulation and Coding Scheme)
   -  PDCPOccupBuffer: The number of packets occupied in PDCP buffer

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 13]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   -  DLPDCPSDUNum: The number of Downlink PDCP SDU packets
   -  DLPDCPLossNum: The number of PDCP SDU packets lost
   -  DLMACRate: The Downlink MAC data rate per UE

   In order to compare the cases with and without NAA, the cloud gaming
   test environment is setup with 1080p resolution and around 20Mbps

   Test scenarios 1~9 are as follows.

   Test scenarios 1: Weak network. This scenario is the case where radio
   link quality is low, e.g., in cell edge area and the bandwidth is not
   able to serve cloud gaming.

   Test scenario 2: User competition scenario. This scenario is defined
   as the case when user amount is large thus the cellular network
   bandwidth cannot serve all the cloud gaming users.

   Test scenario 3-9: Other scenarios with random user movement trace
   and user distribution.

   Test method: To simplify to comparison, we just use two information
   derived from the eNB including the MCS (MCS index) and PRB
   (DLOccupyPRBNum) [TS38.214]. The information is provided directly to
   the application, and the application then adjusts the bit rate
   according to this information. Here, MCS index shows the modulation
   (e.g. QPSK, 16QAM,...) and the coding rate used during physical layer
   transmission, which is relevant to the real data rate per UE. The
   number of Downlink PRBs occupied shows the capacity used in the cell,
   which helps to predict the traffic of network in heavy or light load.
   The benchmark method is adopting a constant bit rate without any
   information to help it predicting the network condition. We compare
   these scenarios and observe the reduction of delay when those eNB
   data are utilized.

   For different scenarios, the lagging rate is defined as the
   performance indicator. In our experiments, lagging happens when
   transmission delay is greater than 200ms and lagging rate is defined
   as the ratio between the number of frames greater than 200ms and the
   total number of frames.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 14]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   |Test Scenario| Reduction of Lagging Rate|
   |     1       |           46%            |
   |     2       |           21%            |
   |     3       |           37%            |
   |     4       |           56%            |
   |     5       |           32%            |
   |     6       |           67%            |
   |     7       |           33%            |
   |     8       |           57%            |
   |     9       |           48%            |
     Figure 4-2: Reduction of Lagging Rate

   It can be clearly seen that with the MCS and PRB information, the
   application can adjust the bit rate to decrease the lagging rate and
   then significantly improve the user QoE. In weak network scenario,
   46% lagging can be avoided by NAA. And the performance gain can even
   reach to 67% in some scenario.

4.3. Analysis of the Experiments

   The above-mentioned technologies demonstrate the performance gain of
   NAA with MoWIE.

   Although application information can also help to predict the network
   and have already been used in adaptive bit rate methods, the
   application information is not as sensitive as eNB information at the
   very beginning in a lot of cases. For example, when more users enter
   the cell, the PRB information will first reflect that each user may
   get less bandwidth. However, the application information needs to
   react after there is a trend that the bitrate is decreasing. That is
   to say, the lower layer network information is more directly.

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 15]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   Without MoWIE, the application cannot get the lower layer network
   information directly and then try to detect "blindly" to adapt to the
   dynamics of the lower layer network, which cannot meet the
   requirements of cloud interactive applications like cloud gaming, low
   delay live show and Cloud VR.

   It is noted that the more real-time network resource status the
   application can learn, the better it can predict how much network
   resource it can use within a prediction time window. However there is
   tradeoff between network information collection frequency and its
   load and feasibility to the network devices. In principle, the total
   network resource consumed for such network status reporting is also
   designed in light-weight manner, e.g., by properly controlling the
   interval of report and also the number of bits needed to convey the
   reported information elements. In our experiments, the network status
   information can be obtained in an adaptive interval based on the
   change rate of network status, in order to provide good prediction
   with less load introduced in the network.

   The distribution and impact of the exposed data to the performance
   gain for different algorithm needs to be further studied. This draft
   is to give a guidance to figure out what kind of data needs to be
   exposed during initial deployment of these mechanisms.

   In our current cloud gaming, the application information can help to
   reduce about 50% the lagging rate. The left 50% improvement room can
   be achieved by network information exposure with MoWIE. Actually, the
   effect of the two-layer information can be accumulated. However, due
   to current deployment limitation, we cannot collect the application
   information with the eNB information at the same time. Thus, in this
   version of the draft we compare the performance with and without
   MoWIE. We don't compare between application information assisted mode
   and network information assisted mode in this draft. This is our on-
   going work. Since both application and eNB information can reflect
   the network variation, we will compare the performance among
   application information assisted mode, network information assisted
   mode and the mode of utilizing both layer information.

5. Standardization Considerations of MoWIE as an Extension to ALTO

   MoWIE can be a realistic, important extension to ALTO to serve the
   aforementioned use cases, in the setting of the newer generation (5G)
   of cellular network, which is a completely open IP based network

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 16]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   where routers/UPF with IP connectivity will be deployed much closer
   to the users. One may consider not only the aforementioned cloud-
   based multimedia applications, but also other latency sensitive
   applications such as connected vehicles and automotive driving.

   Extending ALTO with MoWIE, therefore, may allow ALTO to expose lower
   layer network information to ensure higher application QoE for a wide
   spectrum of applications.

   One possible approach to standardizing the distribution of the
   network information used in the evaluations is to send such
   information as piggyback information in the datapath. One issue with
   datapath method is that MoWIE intends to convey more complex and rich
   information than current methods. To piggyback such complex and rich
   information in the datapath will take away a lot of datapath
   resource. Moreover the datapath design may bring out more limited
   privacy management, which is very important in MoWIE. In 3GPP,
   network information exposure based on control plane mechanism is
   introduced in 4G and 5G systems. We mainly discuss ALTO extension-
   based design in tackling with this problem.

   Specifically, the MoWIE extension will reuse existing ALTO mechanisms
   including information resource directory, extensible performance
   metrics and calendaring, and unified properties. It also requires
   modular, reusable extensions, which we plan to specify in detail in a
   separate document. Below is an overview of key considerations;
   security considerations are in the following section.

   -  Network information selection and binding consideration: Instead of
      hardcoding only specific network information, a modular design of
      MoWIE is an ability for an ALTO client to select only the relevant
      information (e.g., cell DLOccupyPRBNum  metric and UE MCS) and then
      request correspondingly. Existing ALTO information resource
      directory is a starting point, but the design needs to be generic,
      to provide abstraction for ease of use and extensibility. The
      security mechanisms of the existing ALTO protocol should also be
      extended to enforce proper authorization.

   -  Compact network information encoding consideration: One benefit of
      ALTO is its high-level JSON based encoding. When the update
      frequency increases, the existing base protocol and existing
      extensions (in particular the SSE extension), however, may have

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 17]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

     high bandwidth and processing overhead. Hence, encoding and
     processing overhead of MoWIE should be considered.

   -  Stability and reliability consideration: A key benefit of the MoWIE
      extension is the ability to allow more flexible, better coordinated
      control. Any control mechanism, however, should integrate
      fundamental overhead, stability and reliability mechanisms. .

6. Security Considerations

   The collection, distribution of MoWIE information should consider the
   security requirements on information privacy and information
   integration protection and authentication in both sides. Since the
   network status is not directly related to any special user, there is
   currently no any privacy issue. But the information transmitted to
   the application can pass through a lot of middle box and can be
   changed by the man in the middle. To protect the network information,
   an end to end encryption and integration is needed. Also, the network
   needs to authenticate the information exposure provided to right
   applications. These security requirements can be implemented by the
   TLS and other security mechanisms.

7. References

7.1. Normative References

   [Fahad]  Fahad Fazal Elahi Guraya ; Faouzi Alaya Cheikh ; Victor
            Medina; A Novel Visual Saliency Model for Surveillance
            Video Compression, 2011 Seventh International Conference
            on Signal Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems

   [Hongzi] Hongzi Mao; Ravi Netravali; Mohammad Alizadeh; Neural
            Adaptive Video Streaming with Pensieve; SIGCOMM '17:
            Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest
            Group on Data Communication; August 2017 Pages 197-210

   [Saccadic]  E. Matin, Saccadic suppression: a review and an
            analysis, Psychological bulletin 81 (12) (1974) 899-917.

   [Borji]  A. Borji, L. Itti, State-of-the-art Analysis and Machine
            Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 35 (1) (2013) 185-

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 18]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   [MPC]      X. Yin, A. Jindal, V. Sekar, and B. Sinopoli. 2015. A
              Control-Theoretic Approach for Dynamic Adaptive Video
              Streaming over HTTP. In SIGCOMM. ACM.

   [CS2P]     Y. Sun et al. 2016. CS2P: Improving Video Bitrate Selection
              and Adaptation with Data-Driven Throughput Prediction. In
              SIGCOMM. ACM.

   [Hongzi2]  Hongzi Mao, Shannon Chen, Drew Dimmery, Shaun Singh, Drew
              Blaisdell, Yuandong Tian, Mohammad Alizadeh, Eytan Bakshy;
              Real-world Video Adaptation with Reinforcement Learning ;
              ICML 2 2019 Workshop RL4RealLife

   [Saliency] Chenlei Guo, Liming Zhang; A Novel Multiresolution
              Spatiotemporal Saliency Detection Model and Its
              Applications in Image and Video Compression, IEEE

   [Minbarrier]  Jianming Zhang, Stan Sclaroff, Zhe Lin, Xiaohui Shen,
              Brian Price, Radomir Mech; Minimum barrier salient object
              detection at 80 fps. The IEEE International Conference on
              Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015, pp. 1404-1412.

   [LSTM]     Lai Jiang; Mai Xu; Zulin Wang; Predicting video Saliency
              with Object-to-Motion CNN and Two-layer Convolutional
              LSTM, arXiv:1709.06316v3 [cs.CV] 14 Jan 2019

   7.2. Informative References

   [TS23.501] 3GPP TS 23.501 System architecture for the 5G System

   [TS38.214] 3GPP TS 38.214, NR Physical layer procedures for data,

   [TS26.114] 3GPP TS 26.114,   IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS);
              Multimedia telephony; Media handling and interaction,

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 19]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   [MPEG DASH]ISO/IEC 23009, Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP;

   [iiMedia]  2019-2020 China Online Live Streaming Market Research

   [GSMA]     Cloud AR/VR Whitepaper, Last updated on April 26, 2019,

Authors' Addresses
      Wei Huang
         Tencent Building,
         No. 10000 Shennan Avenue, Nanshan District
         Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000


   Yunfei Zhang
         Flat 9, No. 10 West Building.
         Xi Bei Wang East Road
         Beijing, 100090


   Y. Richard Yang
         Watson 208A,
         51 Prospect Street
         New Haven, CT 06511


   Chunshan Xiong
         Flat 9, No. 10 West Building.
         Xi Bei Wang East Road
         Beijing, 100090


Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 20]

Internet-Draft  MoWIE for Network Aware Application   March 2020

   Yixue Lei
         Flat 9, No. 10 West Building.
         Xi Bei Wang East Road
         Beijing, 100090


   Yunbo Han
         Tencent Building,
         No. 10000 Shennan Avenue, Nanshan District
         Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000


   Gang Li
         China Mobile Research Institute
         No.32, Xuanwumenxi Ave, Xicheng District
         Beijing 100053,

Huang  Expires September 10, 2020  [Page 21]