Skip to main content

Seamless Integration of Ethernet VPN (EVPN) with Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) and Their Provider Backbone Bridge (PBB) Equivalents
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-07

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ@ietf.org, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, Matthew Bocci <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, matthew.bocci@nokia.com, bess-chairs@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Protocol Action: '(PBB-)EVPN Seamless Integration with (PBB-)VPLS' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-06.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- '(PBB-)EVPN Seamless Integration with (PBB-)VPLS'
  (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-06.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Deborah Brungard and Martin
Vigoureux.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This draft specifies procedures for backward compatibility of the
   (PBB-)EVPN solution with (PBB-)VPLS and provides mechanisms for
   seamless integration of the two technologies in the same MPLS/IP
   network on a per-VPN-instance basis. Implementation of this draft
   enables service providers to introduce (PBB-)EVPN PEs in their brown-
   field deployments of (PBB-)VPLS networks.

Working Group Summary

   The document was developed to provide mechanisms to enable EVPN and traditional
   VPLS to work together in the same network in as seamless a way as practicable. This is
   important for service providers migrating from old VPLS deployments to new technologies
   such as EVPN. 

   There is one IPR declaration on the draft . 

Document Quality

   No concerns about the quality of the document. It represents 
   WG consensus, and it has been widely reviewed and discussed  over a 
   number of years. 
   
   The document does not specify any MIB changes or additions which would need 
   review.

Personnel

   The document shepherd is Matthew Bocci
   The responsible Area Director is Martin Vigoureux

RFC Editor Note