YANG-CBOR: Allocating SID ranges for PEN holders
draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-06

Yes

Mike Bishop
Mohamed Boucadair

No Objection

Andy Newton
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Mahesh Jethanandani
Roman Danyliw
(Erik Kline)
(Paul Wouters)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Mike Bishop
Yes
Mohamed Boucadair
Yes
Comment (2025-12-10 for -04) Sent for earlier 
Hi Carsten, 

Thanks for the continued effort to work on YANG-CBOR/SIDs, and this document in particular. 

Thanks to both Dhruv and Nabeel for their reviews and Carsten for engaging and changes.

The approach looks good to me. Please find below some few comments: 

# 32473

As a side effect of this policy, two SIDs ranges are thus available for documentation purposes as well. I would call out these explicitly in the document.

# Please use 32473 for this example + companion range explanation

CURRENT:
   The Department for Mathematics and Computer Science of Universität
   Bremen holds PEN 30810.

Refer to the IESG statement on the matter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-assignable-codepoints-for-examples-in-ietf-specifications/ (see the first sentence of the last para of the statement). 

# nits: The abstract should be self-contained. Please add RFC titles in the abstract.

Cheers,
Med
Andy Newton
No Objection
Comment (2025-12-17 for -04) Sent 
# Andy Newton, ART AD, comments for draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-04 
CC @anewton1998

* line numbers:
  - https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-04.txt&submitcheck=True

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

Thanks to Joseph Yee for his ARTART review.

## Comments

I support Eric's DISCUSS around the IANA issues.
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Éric Vyncke
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2025-12-19 for -05) Sent 
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and Ines's IoT-directorate review.

For history: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/iUravlXxrARy4Xk5Q9m-GM6yHJs/
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Comment (2025-12-10 for -04) Not sent 
Thanks for the work is described in this document. I do not see any transport-protocol related concerns for this document.
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-12-17 for -04) Not sent 
Thank you to Gyan Mishra for the GENART review.
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2025-12-12 for -04) Not sent 
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-core-yang-sid-pen-04
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

* NOTE: full disclosure, I am the registrant of a PEN.
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -04) Not sent