Internationalized Email Headers
draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-13
Yes
(Pete Resnick)
No Objection
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-18)
Unknown
It would be nice to concentrate section 7 into "changes from RFC 5335" and retain it in the document.
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-20)
Unknown
Ari Keränen helped me review this, and he said:
Should state in the abstract that this obsoletes and updated various RFCs.
3. Changes to Message Header Fields
Also note that messages in this format require the use of the
&UTF8SMTPbis;
The "&UTF8SMTPbis;" looks like a processing error.
3.4. Effects on Line Length Limits
Section 2.1.1 of [RFC5322] limits lines to 998 characters and
recommends that the lines be restricted to only 78 characters. This
specification changes the former limit to 988 octets.
What is the rationale behind the 988 octet limit?
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-20)
Unknown
The title page header indicates that this document obsoletes RFC 5335. Please add this fact to the abstract. The title page header indicates that this document updates RFC 2045. Please add this fact to the abstract. The title page header indicates that this document updates RFC 5322. Please add this fact to the abstract.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-16)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-10-16)
Unknown
Almost a total nit but p7 says "If this type is sent to a 7-bit only system, it has to have..." - to what does the "it" refer the emitter of the message or the 7-bit only system? Also - wouldn't saying "<somone> MUST do <something>" not be clearer than saying "has to have"
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown