Skip to main content

Changing the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Location Profiles Registry Policy
draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-02

Yes

Erik Kline
(Murray Kucherawy)

No Objection

Roman Danyliw
(Alvaro Retana)
(Francesca Palombini)
(Lars Eggert)
(Martin Duke)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

Erik Kline
Yes
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2021-03-25 for -01) Sent
I agree with comments of Ben & Warren on this document.

Minor nits:
- missing IETF consensus boilerplate
- wrong IESG state ;-)
- slightly annoyed by the US-centric note of NENA (i.e., unsure whether it helps the document, mentioning other SDO could be enough). No need to change the text


-éric
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -01) Unknown

                            
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Not sent

                            
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2021-03-23 for -01) Sent
Section 4

   IANA is requested to change the policy of the Location-to-Service
   Translation (LoST) Location Profile Registry (established by
   [RFC5222]) to Specification Required.  The expert reviewer is
   designated by the responsible area director.  The reviewer should
   verify that:

(nit) per RFC 8126, the DE is "appointed by the IESG, normally upon
recommendation by the relevant Area Director", which is not quite
aligned with the "designated by the responsible area director" text used
here.
Francesca Palombini Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Not sent

                            
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2021-03-24 for -01) Not sent
I agree with Ben's nit; otherwise, looks good to me.
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Not sent

                            
Martin Duke Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (for -01) Not sent

                            
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2021-03-22 for -01) Sent
Hi,

Thanks for this document.

One minor comment: It might be helpful to readers to mention IANA in the abstract.

E.g., changing "Translation (LoST) Location Profile registry" to "Translation (LoST) Location Profile IANA registry".

Regards,
Rob
Warren Kumari Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2021-03-24 for -01) Not sent
I love these sorts of documents - after a long session of reviewing really thik tomes, it's great to open a document and be able to review it in a single cop-of-coffee :-)
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2021-03-19 for -01) Sent
looks useful to me.