Shepherd writeup
rfc8514-01

Document Shepherd Write-Up for draft-extra-savedate

1. This document is being requested as a Proposed Standard because it
extends an existing Proposed Standard (RFC3501).

2.

Technical Summary

  This spec extends IMAP with an additional data point on each
  email in a mailbox which records the time at which the email
  was added to the mailbox.

Working Group Summary

  The only topic of debate was how to deal with mailboxes which don't
  support storing the savedate.  Various ideas were debated, and a
  conclusion was found which everybody was happy with.

Document Quality

  This specification has been implemented in multiple servers and is
  very easy to follow.

Personnel

  Document Shepherd - Bron Gondwana (EXTRA co-chair)
  Responsible Area Director - Alexey Melnikov


3. The Document Shepherd has read the document through in detail and
has implemented it in a server.

4. There are no concerns about reviews, this document has been well reviewed.

5. There is no review required for the document by other areas.

6. There are no concerns with this document that IESG should be aware of.

7. There have been no IPR disclosures for this spec.

8. There have been no IPR disclosures for this spec.

9. The WG consensus is solid.

10. There has been no discontent.

11. The ID nits tool has no issues with this spec.

12. This document doesn't define anything which needs formal review
outside the working group.

13. All references have been identified as either normative or
informative.

14. All normative references are published standards.

15. There are no downward normative references references.

16. This RFC does not change the status of any other RFCs.

17. The IANA considerations ask for a single capability to be added
to the IMAP capabilities registry.

18. There are no new IANA registries.

19. The ABNF has been eyeball checked and tested with the online ABNF
validator.


Back