Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension
draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-11
Yes
(Terry Manderson)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -10)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-05)
Unknown
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and comments.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-07-05 for -10)
Unknown
I agree with Alexey's discuss comment.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-07-06 for -10)
Unknown
This bis draft was an improvement. I did have one question. I'm trying to visualize why The registrar indicates the minimum and maximum registration lifetime that it is willing to offer to a requester. A requester SHOULD NOT request registration with lifetime greater than the maximum registration lifetime or smaller than the minimum registration lifetime. is a SHOULD NOT - why would a requester choose to disregard the SHOULD and send a request registration with (for example) a lifetime greater than the maximum registration lifetime? Is the intention for the requester to allow this, and then (for example) cap the lifetime at the maximum registration lifetime? Or is something else supposed to happen? Whatever the intention is, it might be helpful to provide an explanation about that.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-08-05)
Unknown
Thanks for handling my discuss point.
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown