Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension
draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-08

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2016-08-05)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and comment.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-07-05 for -07)
No email
send info
The IANA considerations section does not seem to stand alone without reading RFC 5204. In my opinion, this draft should replicate the appropriate information, so that one does not need to read the obsoleted RFC to fully understand the IANA considerations.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -07)
No email
send info