Issues in Revising BGP-4 (RFC1771 to RFC4271)
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-issues-06

 
Document
Type Expired Internet-Draft (idr WG)
Last updated 2012-10-04 (latest revision 2012-03-27)
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html
Stream
WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Susan Hares
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2012-07-29)
IESG
IESG state Expired (IESG: Dead)
Telechat date
Responsible AD Stewart Bryant
Send notices to idr-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-issues@ietf.org

Email authors IPR References Referenced by Nits Search lists

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
//www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-issues-06.txt

Abstract

This document records the issues discussed and the consensus reached in the Interdomain Routing (IDR) Working Group during its efforts to revise and bring up to date the base specification for the BGP-4 protocol as documented in RFC1771. The document focuses on the changes tracked from August 2002 when the last major push for revision began. The results of these efforts are encoded in RFC4271, which should be taken as normative for any of the issues that were discussed. The discussion here is intended to record how and why some of the changes to BGP were made.

Authors

Andrew Lange (andrew.lange@alcatel-lucent.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)