Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Data Model
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-06
|
Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (ippm WG)
|
|
Authors |
|
Greg Mirsky
,
Xiao Min
,
Wei Luo
|
|
Last updated |
|
2020-10-07
|
|
Replaces |
|
draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-yang
|
|
Stream |
|
IETF
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
xml
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
|
Yang Validation |
|
☯
0 errors, 2 warnings.
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-06.txt:
xym 0.4.10:
Extracting 'ietf-stamp@2020-10-07.yang'
Removed 1 empty lines
ietf-stamp@2020-10-07.yang:
pyang 2.4.0: pyang --verbose --ietf -p {libs} {model}:
# module search path: a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/:/a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/draftmod/:/a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/ianamod/:/a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/catalogmod/:.:/var/lib/wwwrun/yang/modules:/a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.26.0/env/share/yang/modules
# read ietf-stamp@2020-10-07.yang (CL)
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.26.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-inet-types.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/draftmod/ietf-inet-types@2021-02-22.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.26.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-yang-types.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/draftmod/ietf-yang-types@2021-02-22.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.26.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-key-chain.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-key-chain@2017-06-15.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.26.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-netconf-acm.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-netconf-acm@2018-02-14.yang
ietf-stamp@2020-10-07.yang:53: warning: RFC 8407: 3.1: The IETF Trust Copyright statement seems to be missing (see pyang --ietf-help for details).
ietf-stamp@2020-10-07.yang:581: warning: the module seems to use RFC 2119 keywords, but the required text from RFC 8174 is not found (see pyang --ietf-help for details).
yanglint SO 1.6.7: yanglint --verbose -p {tmplib} -p {rfclib} -p {draftlib} -p {ianalib} -p {cataloglib} {model} -i:
No validation errors
|
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
Additional Resources |
|
|
Stream |
WG state
|
|
WG Document
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
Tal Mizrahi
|
IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
|
Network Working Group G. Mirsky
Internet-Draft X. Min
Intended status: Standards Track ZTE Corp.
Expires: April 10, 2021 W. Luo
Ericsson
October 7, 2020
Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) Data Model
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-06
Abstract
This document specifies the data model for implementations of
Session-Sender and Session-Reflector for Simple Two-way Active
Measurement Protocol (STAMP) mode using YANG.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 10, 2021.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Mirsky, et al. Expires April 10, 2021 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft STAMP Data Model October 2020
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Scope, Model, and Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Data Model Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.1. STAMP-Sender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.2. STAMP-Reflector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Appendix A. Example of STAMP Session Configuration . . . . . . . 34
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
1. Introduction
The Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) [RFC8762] can
be used to measure performance parameters of IP networks such as
latency, jitter, and packet loss by sending test packets and
monitoring their experience in the network. The STAMP protocol
[RFC8762] in unauthenticated mode is on-wire compatible with STAMP
Light, discussed in Appendix I [RFC5357]. The STAMP Light is known
to have many implementations though no common management framework
being defined, thus leaving some aspects of test packet processing to
interpretation. As one of the goals of STAMP is to support these
variations, this document presents their analysis; describes common
STAMP and STAMP model while allowing for STAMP extensions in the
future. This document defines the STAMP data model and specifies it
formally, using the YANG data modeling language [RFC7950].
This version of the interfaces data model conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [RFC8342].
1.1. Conventions used in this document
1.1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
Mirsky, et al. Expires April 10, 2021 [Page 2]
Show full document text