Internet Email to Support Diverse Service Environments (Lemonade) Profile
draft-ietf-lemonade-profile-07
Yes
(Ted Hardie)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Sam Hartman)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-28)
Unknown
I won't make these Gen-ART review comments from Spencer Dawkins a DISCUSS, but they both deserve a moment's thought. In Section 3, "Lemonade clients SHOULD take advantage of these features." doesn't look like a normative/2119 "SHOULD". BC: agreed, I would change it to lower case. In section 3.3, I suppose the SHOULD NOT in A LEMONADE compliant client SHOULD use message size declaration. In particular it SHOULD NOT send a message to a mail submission server, if the client knows that the message exceeds the maximal message size advertised by the submission server. is OK, but <snip> BC: well, I don't see why it would ever be OK to send a message that's too long. Maybe this should just be MUST NOT.
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-30)
Unknown
Please change "mandatory to implement" to "mandatory-to-implement" throughout the document. Please change "TLS protected" to "TLS-protected" throughout the document.
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-01-31)
Unknown
There shouldn't be any citations in the Abstract.