A YANG Data Model for IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes and Flexible Algorithm
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flex-algo-yang-21

Yes

Gunter Van de Velde

No Objection

Andy Newton
Christopher Inacio
Deb Cooley
Éric Vyncke
Gorry Fairhurst
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mahesh Jethanandani
Mike Bishop
Mohamed Boucadair
Roman Danyliw
Tommy Jensen

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Gunter Van de Velde
Yes
Andy Newton
No Objection
Christopher Inacio
No Objection
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-22 for -08) Sent 
Section 4:  Consider leaving a note to the RFC Editor to update RFC 8446 to RFC 9846, if it is published before this draft (it is currently in Auth 48).
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-22 for -08) Sent 
Thanks for the work done in this document. Some comments

### Section 3

Just doing my IESG evaluation of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-flex-algo-yang and reading that this common YANG module is indeed shared and does not "belong" to OSPF, so, all is good and my previous comment below can be ignoed.

> About this IS-IS YANG module re-using a type specified in draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-flex-algo-yang. If common to IS-IS and OSPF, then why not having a common module ? (of course, it this is the *only* common thing, then my comment can be ignored)

Should the unit be specified in all the bandwidth-related leaf nodes ?

Unusual presentation with the YANG tree directly followed by the YANG module, why not ? ;-)
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Comment (2026-07-01 for -18) Not sent 
I see no transport protocol issues, thanks for doing this work.

It was hard to read this without a short introduction to the various parts - See other IESG feedback.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2026-07-18 for -20) Sent 
Thanks to the authors and the WG for their work on this document.

Also thanks to the authors for the discussion on my original ballot and the updates to address the concerns raised.
Mahesh Jethanandani
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-30 for -17) Sent 
Thank you for addressing my comments.
Mike Bishop
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-26 for -12) Sent 
This is a YANG data model with an introduction; there's no description of what these fields are, etc. I support Med's DISCUSS.

# Nits

In 11 places: "This augment IS-IS" should probably be "This augments IS-IS"
Mohamed Boucadair
(was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2026-07-08 for -19) Sent 
Hi Yingzhen, Acee, and Madhavi, 

The changes made are great [1]. Thank you for taking caring of all the comments in my previous ballot [2]. Much appreciated. 

Cheers,
Med

[1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flex-algo-yang-08&url2=draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flex-algo-yang-19&difftype=--html

[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ydQQNGc5m4cFrDpH7CYOWP3tEKU/
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2026-06-25 for -09) Not sent 
Thank you to Russ Housley for the GENART review.
Tommy Jensen
No Objection