Mobile IPv6 and Firewalls: Problem Statement
draft-ietf-mip6-firewalls-04
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-02-16)
Unknown
I think the abstract is too long. Section 5 shoud probably point out that the issues can be decoupled. In particular, it is not necessary to consider the case when both the MN and CN are behind a firewall because doing so presents no new issues that are not in the decoupled exploration. Overall I found the document clear and well written.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown