Skip to main content

Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library
draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-18

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby@ietf.org, mjethanandani@gmail.com, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, thomas.graf@swisscom.com
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-17.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Augmented-by Addition to the YANG Library'
  (draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-17.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Network Configuration Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Mahesh Jethanandani and Mohamed Boucadair.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document augments the ietf-yang-library to provide the
   augmented-by list.  It facilitates the process of obtaining all
   dependencies between YANG modules, by querying the network management
   server's YANG library.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/Zephyre777/draft-lincla-netconf-yang-library-
   augmentation.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

From Shepherd writeup:

There were no particular rough issues. However, worth mentioning is the
limitation augmented-by imposed on module-set which was well discussed in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-123-netconf-202507240730/ with good
consensus and an updated text in -12 clearly describing it.

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

From Shepherd writeup:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-augmentedby-09#section-6.4
lists 4 implementations. It has been most recently tested and validated at
IETF 123 hackathon.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Thomas Graf. The Responsible
   Area Director is Mahesh Jethanandani.

RFC Editor Note