Adding an Uncacheable Directory-Entry Metadata Attribute to NFSv4.2
draft-ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-directories-09
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (nfsv4 WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Thomas Haynes | ||
| Last updated | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Replaces | draft-ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Chuck Lever | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2026-07-22 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | cel-ietf@chucklever.net |
draft-ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-directories-09
Network File System Version 4 T. Haynes
Internet-Draft Hammerspace
Intended status: Standards Track 24 July 2026
Expires: 25 January 2027
Adding an Uncacheable Directory-Entry Metadata Attribute to NFSv4.2
draft-ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-directories-09
Abstract
Network File System version 4.2 (NFSv4.2) clients may cache the file
attributes returned by READDIR alongside each directory entry. This
caching is inherently best-effort: those attributes belong to the
underlying files and change when the files are written, which the
directory's change attribute does not track. In some deployments the
rate of file writes by other clients makes such caching produce
incorrect size and timestamp values often enough to be a deployment
problem. This document introduces an uncacheable dirent metadata
attribute for NFSv4.2 that allows a server to identify a directory
for which an honoring client is required to retrieve directory-entry
metadata from the server on each READDIR rather than serving the
response from a local cache.
Note to Readers
Note to RFC Editor: please remove this section prior to publication.
Discussion of this draft takes place on the NFSv4 working group
mailing list (nfsv4@ietf.org), which is archived at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=nfsv4. Source
code and issues list for this draft can be found at
https://github.com/ietf-wg-nfsv4/uncacheable-directories.
Working Group information can be found at https://github.com/ietf-wg-
nfsv4.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 January 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Deployment Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Caching of Directory-Entry Metadata . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.1. Uncacheable Directory-Entry Metadata . . . . . . . . . . 7
6. Example: Directory Enumeration With and Without Dirent Metadata
Caching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.1. Classic Directory Enumeration (Directory-Entry Metadata
Cached) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6.2. Directory Enumeration With Uncacheable Dirent Metadata . 9
6.3. Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
8. XDR for Uncacheable Dirents Attribute . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
9. Extraction of XDR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
1. Introduction
Clients of remote filesystems may cache the file attributes returned
by READDIR alongside each directory entry, to reduce the volume of
follow-on GETATTR traffic for entries the client has already seen.
This caching is inherently best-effort -- writes to the underlying
files can change those attributes at any time, and the directory's
change attribute does not track such writes. In some deployments the
cost of that staleness is high enough to be a deployment problem; the
conditions are described in Section 2.
In this document, the term directory is used to describe the context
in which directory entries are retrieved. The uncacheable dirent
metadata attribute applies to the caching of directory-entry
metadata, including names and associated file object metadata such as
size and timestamps. It does not prohibit caching of the directory
object itself, nor does it affect caching of file data.
When this best-effort caching returns stale size and timestamp
information for concurrently modified files, it also undermines the
effectiveness of uncacheable file data semantics
([I-D.ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-files]) in the same deployment:
applications can observe inconsistent metadata and data views even
when file data caching is disabled.
This document introduces the uncacheable dirent metadata attribute to
NFSv4.2 to allow servers to advise clients that caching of directory-
entry metadata is unsuitable. Using the process detailed in
[RFC8178], the revisions in this document become an extension of
NFSv4.2 [RFC7862]. They are built on top of the external data
representation (XDR) [RFC4506] generated from [RFC7863].
2. Deployment Motivation
A class of deployment uses NFSv4.2 to serve a shared directory to
many concurrent NFSv4.2 client writers, each writing files within the
directory. Workloads of this kind are typical of High-Performance
Computing (HPC) environments, where a single output directory may
receive results from hundreds or thousands of compute nodes
simultaneously, and of large-scale data-ingest pipelines where many
producers append to a common landing directory. The files within
such a directory have their attributes -- size and timestamps in
particular -- modified at a high rate by clients other than the one
performing READDIR.
NFSv4.2 client implementations typically cache READDIR responses for
a period bounded by either the directory's change attribute or a
heuristic timeout. The cached file attributes returned by READDIR
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
are NOT invalidated by the directory's change attribute -- they are
only invalidated by writes to the underlying files, which the
directory's change attribute does not track. In deployments of the
kind described above, the rate at which the underlying files are
written by other clients can exceed what such caches can track, so
that an NFSv4.2 client serving READDIR responses from its local cache
will, with some regularity, return file attribute values that no
longer reflect the current state of those files at the server.
The fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata attribute is the server's
mechanism to identify a directory for which this risk is high enough
that client-side caching is not safe. When the server sets the
attribute on a directory, an honoring client retrieves directory-
entry metadata from the server on each READDIR rather than from a
local cache.
3. Definitions
dirent A directory entry returned by READDIR -- the (name, file
handle) pair that names a file or subdirectory within a directory.
A dirent itself does not include the file attributes returned
alongside it.
dirent metadata The file attributes (size, mtime, ctime, atime,
mode, owner, etc.) returned in a READDIR response alongside each
dirent. These attributes belong to the underlying file object,
not to the directory; they change when the underlying file is
written, which is independent of the directory's change attribute.
The term "dirent metadata" in this document is a naming
convenience for "the file attributes that arrive in a READDIR
response"; it does not assert that those attributes inherit the
directory's cache-coherence semantics.
dirent caching A client-side cache of READDIR results -- the (name,
file handle, file attributes) tuples -- used to avoid repeated
READDIR and GETATTR traffic. Because the file attributes in a
cached READDIR response are not invalidated by the directory's
change attribute (only by writes to the underlying files), this
caching is inherently best-effort and subject to staleness
whenever the underlying files are modified.
uncacheable dirent metadata attribute An NFSv4.2 file attribute that
advises clients not to cache directory-entry metadata associated
with file objects, including names, size, and timestamps.
This document assumes familiarity with NFSv4.2 operations,
attributes, and error handling as defined in [RFC8881] and [RFC7862].
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
4. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
5. Caching of Directory-Entry Metadata
The uncacheable dirent metadata attribute enables servers to identify
directories where the staleness of cached READDIR attributes is
particularly likely and particularly damaging. It is an OPTIONAL
attribute to implement for NFSv4.2. If both the client and the
server support this attribute, and the attribute is set on a
directory, the client MUST retrieve directory-entry metadata from the
server on each READDIR rather than serving the response from a local
cache.
This document specifies the required observable behavior rather than
mandating a particular internal implementation strategy. Clients MAY
employ more sophisticated mechanisms, such as time-limited caches
that revalidate against the server on each READDIR, provided that the
externally visible behavior is equivalent to retrieving directory-
entry metadata from the server on each READDIR.
Allowing clients to set this attribute provides a portable mechanism
to request that directory-entry metadata not be cached, without
requiring changes to application behavior or out-of-band
administrative configuration.
A client can determine whether the uncacheable dirent metadata
attribute is supported for a given directory by examining the
supported_attrs attribute for that directory's filesystem or by
probing support using the procedures described in [RFC8178].
The only way that the server can determine that the client supports
the attribute is if the client sends either a GETATTR or a SETATTR
with the uncacheable dirent metadata attribute.
The uncacheable dirent metadata attribute governs the client's
caching of READDIR responses for the directory. It does NOT govern:
* The client's per-file attribute cache for individual children of
the directory, populated by direct GETATTR (for example, following
a LOOKUP). Such caches are governed by the attribute-cache
mechanisms already defined by NFSv4.2 and are subject to the same
staleness from concurrent writes; clients in deployments using
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
this attribute may wish to apply correspondingly short cache
lifetimes to per-file attributes for children of the directory,
but the present attribute does not require this.
* The directory's own attribute cache. The directory object's own
attributes (mode, owner, etc.) can be cached normally and
revalidated via the directory's change attribute as usual.
* Operations that do not return file attributes in their response
(for example, LOOKUP without a following GETATTR, ACCESS). These
are unaffected.
The uncacheable dirent metadata attribute addresses a different
aspect of client-side caching than fattr4_uncacheable_file_data
([I-D.ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-files]). The file data attribute
governs caching of file contents, while the dirent metadata attribute
governs caching of file attributes returned by READDIR. The
attributes are independent and may be used separately.
This attribute follows the same pattern as
fattr4_uncacheable_file_data ([I-D.ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-files])
applied at the file-data layer. In both cases:
* The underlying NFSv4.2 protocol permits client-side caching that
can become stale.
* Client caching of the relevant data is widely implemented in
practice and reduces network traffic for stable objects.
* For specific objects where the deployment knows the caching will
produce incorrect results, the server requires a mechanism to
instruct an honoring client to suppress the caching for those
specific objects.
* The attribute does not redefine the legality of caching in the
general case. It is a per-object server-side signal that the
caching is known to be unsuitable for that object.
The attribute does NOT make READDIR-attr caching reliable for
directories where it is not set. Clients MUST NOT interpret the
absence of fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata, or its value being
false, as a guarantee that cached READDIR attributes are
authoritative. As stated in [RFC8881] Section 10.3.2, all client-
cached attributes are subject to staleness; the attribute defined in
this document only identifies directories for which staleness is
particularly likely and particularly damaging.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
This attribute does not define behavior for positive or negative name
caching or for caching of LOOKUP results outside the scope of file
attributes returned by READDIR.
Directory delegations grant a client exclusive caching rights subject
to server recall. In deployments where directory contents change at
a rate that makes per-change recall impractical, a directory
delegation does not provide the always-refetch semantics defined by
the uncacheable dirent metadata attribute. These mechanisms are
independent.
Clients MUST NOT assume that directory-entry metadata is valid beyond
the READDIR that produced it.
5.1. Uncacheable Directory-Entry Metadata
The fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata attribute is a read-write
boolean attribute that applies to directory objects. Authorization
to query or modify this attribute is governed by existing NFSv4.2
authorization mechanisms.
Because the attribute applies only to directory objects, a server
MUST return NFS4ERR_INVAL in response to a GETATTR or SETATTR that
requests fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata on an object that is not
a directory.
This attribute is set per directory. This document does not define
propagation of the attribute to subdirectories created within a
directory on which it is set; any such inheritance is a matter of
local server policy.
If a directory object has the uncacheable dirent metadata attribute
set, the client MUST retrieve directory-entry metadata from the
server on each READDIR rather than serving the response from a local
cache. This ensures that the returned metadata reflects the current
state of the directory as determined by the server.
The uncacheable dirent metadata attribute does not modify the
semantics of the NFSv4.2 change attribute. Clients MUST continue to
use the change attribute to detect directory modifications and to
determine when directory contents may have changed, even when
directory-entry metadata caching is suppressed. Suppressing caching
of directory-entry metadata does not remove the need for change-based
validation.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
Servers SHOULD assume that clients which do not query or set this
attribute may cache directory-entry metadata, and therefore SHOULD
NOT rely on this attribute for correctness unless client support is
confirmed.
A directory delegation grants a client the right to cache directory-
entry metadata until the server recalls the delegation. The always-
refetch rule of this attribute is incompatible with that grant. If a
directory has both the uncacheable dirent metadata attribute set and
an outstanding directory delegation, the server MUST recall the
delegation, after which the client follows the always-refetch rule on
each subsequent READDIR. A server MUST NOT grant a new directory
delegation on a directory while the uncacheable dirent metadata
attribute is set on that directory.
6. Example: Directory Enumeration With and Without Dirent Metadata
Caching
This example illustrates the difference in client-visible behavior
when directory-entry metadata caching is enabled versus when the
uncacheable dirent metadata attribute is set on a directory. In both
scenarios, the set of entries in the directory does not change
between the two calls; an attribute value of one entry is updated at
the server between calls. The difference is whether the second call
observes the updated attribute value.
6.1. Classic Directory Enumeration (Directory-Entry Metadata Cached)
In this scenario, the client caches directory-entry metadata obtained
from the server and reuses it for the second readdir.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
Application NFSv4.2 Client NFSv4.2 Server
----------- -------------- --------------
readdir("/dir")
|
| READDIR
|-------------------->------------------------>
| entries:
| a (size=100)
| b (size=200)
| c (size=300)
|<--------------------<------------------------
|
(entries cached in client)
(concurrent writer extends
a from size=100 to
size=500)
readdir("/dir")
|
| (no network traffic)
| entries returned from
| client cache:
| a (size=100)
| b (size=200)
| c (size=300)
Figure 1: Directory-Entry Metadata Cached
In this case, Figure 1 shows that directory-entry metadata retrieved
by the first READDIR is reused to satisfy the second. The cached
response reflects entry a's size as it was at the time of the first
call; it does not reflect the update that occurred at the server
between calls. This behavior is typical of legacy NFSv4.2 clients
and maximizes performance, but it can result in applications
observing dirent attribute values that do not reflect the current
state of the server.
6.2. Directory Enumeration With Uncacheable Dirent Metadata
In this scenario, the directory has the uncacheable dirent metadata
attribute set. The client retrieves directory-entry metadata from
the server on each READDIR.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
Application NFSv4.2 Client NFSv4.2 Server
----------- -------------- --------------
readdir("/dir")
|
| READDIR
|-------------------->------------------------>
| entries:
| a (size=100)
| b (size=200)
| c (size=300)
|<--------------------<------------------------
|
(no directory-entry metadata retained)
(concurrent writer extends
a from size=100 to
size=500)
readdir("/dir")
|
| READDIR
|-------------------->------------------------>
| entries:
| a (size=500)
| b (size=200)
| c (size=300)
|<--------------------<------------------------
Figure 2: Directory-Entry Metadata Not Cached
In this case, Figure 2 shows that each readdir request results in a
READDIR operation sent to the server, so the second call observes the
updated size of entry a. The set of entries returned is unchanged
between calls; only the attribute value differs. The client may
still cache other information, provided the externally observable
behavior is equivalent to retrieving directory-entry metadata from
the server on each READDIR.
6.3. Discussion
This example demonstrates that the uncacheable dirent metadata
attribute does not mandate a particular client implementation, but it
does require the always-refetch behavior specified in Section 5.1.
The attribute ensures that NFSv4.2 clients observe file attribute
values reflecting the current state of the server in deployments
where staleness of READDIR-returned attributes is known to be a
recurring problem.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
7. Implementation Status
Note to RFC Editor: please remove this section prior to publication.
There is a prototype Hammerspace server which implements the
uncacheable dirent metadata attribute and a prototype Linux client
which treats the attribute as an indication to retrieve directory-
entry metadata from the server on each READDIR rather than from a
local cache.
In the prototype, directories whose contents change at the server at
a rate exceeding typical client cache lifetimes are marked with the
fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata attribute.
The Linux client decodes the attribute in fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c into a
per-inode flag (nfsi->uncacheable). The readdir path in fs/nfs/dir.c
consults this flag to skip the readdir cache and refetch from the
server on each readdir call. Clients may employ more sophisticated
mechanisms, such as time-limited caches that revalidate against the
server on each READDIR, provided that the externally observable
behavior matches the always-refetch semantics described in this
document.
At the time of writing, the prototype encodes the attribute on the
wire alongside the companion file-data attribute defined in
[I-D.ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-files] as a single shared flag. A
follow-on prototype branch separates the two attributes as the two
documents specify.
Experience with the prototype indicates that the attribute enables
servers to identify directories whose contents change faster than
typical NFSv4.2 client cache lifetimes can track, while remaining
compatible with existing NFSv4.2 semantics.
8. XDR for Uncacheable Dirents Attribute
///
/// typedef bool fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata;
///
/// const FATTR4_UNCACHEABLE_DIRENT_METADATA = 88;
///
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
9. Extraction of XDR
This document contains the external data representation (XDR)
[RFC4506] description of the uncacheable dirent metadata attribute.
The XDR description is presented in a manner that facilitates easy
extraction into a ready-to-compile format. To extract the machine-
readable XDR description, use the following shell script:
#!/bin/sh
grep '^ *///' $* | sed 's?^ */// ??' | sed 's?^ *///$??'
For example, if the script is named 'extract.sh' and this document is
named 'spec.txt', execute the following command:
sh extract.sh < spec.txt > uncacheable_prot.x
This script removes leading blank spaces and the sentinel sequence
'///' from each line. XDR descriptions with the sentinel sequence
are embedded throughout the document.
Note that the XDR code contained in this document depends on types
from the NFSv4.2 nfs4_prot.x file (generated from [RFC7863]). This
includes both nfs types that end with a 4, such as offset4, length4,
etc., as well as more generic types such as uint32_t and uint64_t.
While the XDR can be appended to that from [RFC7863], the code
snippets should be placed in their appropriate sections within the
existing XDR.
10. Security Considerations
This attribute is not a security mechanism. It addresses correctness
of client-side caching when client-cached directory-entry metadata
can become stale relative to the current state of the directory at
the server. It does not change NFSv4.2 authentication or
authorization semantics, and it does not impose access controls on
the entries it describes.
Authorization to set or modify the fattr4_uncacheable_dirent_metadata
attribute is governed by existing NFSv4.2 authorization mechanisms.
Servers MAY restrict modification of this attribute based on local
policy, file ownership, or access control rules. This document does
not define a new authorization model.
Because the attribute is visible to and affects the caching behavior
of all honoring clients, servers should consider the implications of
allowing unprivileged users to set or clear it. Setting the
attribute on a directory forces honoring clients to abandon READDIR
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
caching and refetch directory-entry metadata on every enumeration,
which can increase load on the server and on other clients. A server
MAY restrict modification of the attribute based on administrative
configuration, export policy, or ownership.
If the client supports Labeled NFS (see [RFC7204] for background),
the client MUST locally enforce the MAC security policies defined by
NFSv4.2 ([RFC7862], Section 9). This obligation is independent of
whether directory-entry metadata is cached or refetched.
The uncacheable dirent metadata attribute allows servers to indicate
that directory-entry metadata should not be assumed to remain valid
beyond the READDIR that produced it.
11. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC4506] Eisler, M., Ed., "XDR: External Data Representation
Standard", STD 67, RFC 4506, DOI 10.17487/RFC4506, May
2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4506>.
[RFC7862] Haynes, T., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor
Version 2 Protocol", RFC 7862, DOI 10.17487/RFC7862,
November 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7862>.
[RFC7863] Haynes, T., "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor
Version 2 External Data Representation Standard (XDR)
Description", RFC 7863, DOI 10.17487/RFC7863, November
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7863>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8178] Noveck, D., "Rules for NFSv4 Extensions and Minor
Versions", RFC 8178, DOI 10.17487/RFC8178, July 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8178>.
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Uncacheable Dirents July 2026
[RFC8881] Noveck, D., Ed. and C. Lever, "Network File System (NFS)
Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol", RFC 8881,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8881, August 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8881>.
12.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-nfsv4-uncacheable-files]
Haynes, T., "Adding an Uncacheable File Data Attribute to
NFSv4.2", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
nfsv4-uncacheable-files-10, 27 June 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-
uncacheable-files-10>.
[RFC7204] Haynes, T., "Requirements for Labeled NFS", RFC 7204,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7204, April 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7204>.
Acknowledgments
Trond Myklebust, Mike Snitzer, Jon Flynn, Keith Mannthey, and Thomas
Haynes all worked on the prototype at Hammerspace.
Rick Macklem, Chuck Lever, Dave Noveck, and Sorin Faibish reviewed
the document.
Chris Inacio, Brian Pawlowski, Chuck Lever, Zahed Sarker, and Gorry
Fairhurst helped guide this process.
Author's Address
Thomas Haynes
Hammerspace
Email: loghyr@gmail.com
Haynes Expires 25 January 2027 [Page 14]