OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels
draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Martin Vigoureux Yes

Ignas Bagdonas No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Roman Danyliw (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2019-08-27)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my Discuss item.

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Comment (2019-08-07 for -06)
Section 4

Do the two steps listed have to happen in a particular order in order to
avoid breakage?

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

Comment (2019-08-07 for -06)
No email
send info
"NoObj" in the "I read the protocol action, and I trust the sponsoring AD so have no problem and / or this is outside my area of expertise or have no cycles" sense of the term.

I ran out of cycles, and so am relying on the OpsDir review; thanks Tim.

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

Comment (2019-07-30 for -06)
Sec 1: "This document updates [RFC5786] so that a router can also announce
   one or more local X-AF addresses using the corresponding Local
   Address sub-TLV.  Routers using the Node Attribute TLV [RFC5786] can
   include non-TE enabled interface addresses in their OSPF TE
   advertisements, and also use the same sub-TLVs to carry X-AF
   information, facilitating the mapping described above."
I wonder if this text should use normative language (s/can/MAY/) as this is the part that actually updates RFC5786, however, I didn't check the exact wording in RFC5786...

Barry Leiba No Objection

Éric Vyncke No Objection

Comment (2019-08-05 for -06)
Alvara, Anton, Michael,

Thank you for the work done for this document.

Just curious about section 3: OSPFv2 routers send their IPv6 address(es) and OSPFv3 routers send their IPv4 address(es). But, what happens when OSPFv3 routers are multi-topology ? Should they also send their IPv6 address(es)? Of course, in this case, the issue fixed by your memo does not exist ;-) Probably worth mentioning anyway that OSPFv3 multi-topology does not need this feature.

Regards,

-éric

Alvaro Retana Recuse

Comment (2019-08-05 for -06)
No email
send info
I am a co-author.