Use of the Synchronization VECtor (SVEC) List for Synchronized Dependent Path Computations
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel) Yes
Jari Arkko No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
Section 4.2 last paragraph, immediately preceding the SVEC-list: Why is #Z omitted from the parenthetical? Section 5.1: if the PCE can't handle the associated SVEC objects it "may send a PCErr message". This implies it might construct the paths anyway. Is there a mechanism to inform the PCC that the requested associations were not considered during path construction?