Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE).
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-07

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (pce WG)
Last updated 2019-04-24
Replaces draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream WG state WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC
Document shepherd Adrian Farrel
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
PCE Working Group                                               D. Dhody
Internet-Draft                                                    Y. Lee
Intended status: Informational                       Huawei Technologies
Expires: October 26, 2019                                  D. Ceccarelli
                                                                Ericsson
                                                                 J. Shin
                                                              SK Telecom
                                                                 D. King
                                                    Lancaster University
                                                     O. Gonzalez de Dios
                                                          Telefonica I+D
                                                          April 24, 2019

         Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE).
                    draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-07

Abstract

   A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information on
   the current network state, including: computed Label Switched Path
   (LSPs), reserved resources within the network, and pending path
   computation requests. This information may then be considered when
   computing new traffic engineered LSPs, and for associated
   and dependent LSPs, received from Path Computation Clients (PCCs).

   The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture,
   provides an architecture to allow the optimum sequence of
   inter-connected domains to be selected, and network policy to be
   applied if applicable, via the use of a hierarchical relationship
   between PCEs.

   Combining the capabilities of Stateful PCE and the Hierarchical PCE
   would be advantageous. This document describes general considerations
   and use cases for the deployment of Stateful PCE(s) using the
   Hierarchical PCE architecture.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
 

Dhody, et al.             Expires October 2019                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               STATEFUL-HPCE                    April 2019

   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

 

Dhody, et al.             Expires October 2019                  [Page 2]
Internet-Draft               STATEFUL-HPCE                    April 2019

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
     1.1.  Requirements Language  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     1.2.  Use-cases and Applicability of Hierarchical Stateful PCE .  5
       1.2.1  Applicability to ACTN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       1.2.2  End-to-End Contiguous LSP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       1.2.3  Applicability of a Stateful P-PCE . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   2.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
   3.  Hierarchical Stateful PCE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.1.  Passive Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     3.2.  Active Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     3.3.  PCE Initiation Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
       3.3.1.  Per Domain Stitched LSP  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
   4.  Other Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
     4.1.  Applicability to Inter-Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
   5.  Other Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
     5.1.  Scalability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
     5.2.  Confidentiality  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Show full document text