Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multi-point Networks and Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) Use Case
draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-03
PIM Working Group G. Mirsky
Internet-Draft ZTE Corp.
Intended status: Standards Track J. Xiaoli
Expires: July 25, 2020 ZTE Corporation
January 22, 2020
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for Multi-point Networks and
Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) Use Case
draft-ietf-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case-03
Abstract
This document discusses the use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD) for multi-point networks to provide nodes that participate in
Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) with the sub-
second convergence. Optional extension to PIM-SM Hello, as specified
in RFC 7761, to bootstrap point-to-multipoint BFD session. also
defined in this document.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 25, 2020.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
Mirsky & Xiaoli Expires July 25, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BFD P2MP Use in PIM-SM January 2020
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Applicability of p2mp BFD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Using P2MP BFD in PIM DR/BDR Monitoring . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. P2MP BFD in PIM DR Load Balancing . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Multipoint BFD Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
Faster convergence in the control plane, in general, is beneficial
and allows minimizing periods of traffic blackholing, transient
routing loops, and other scenarios that may negatively affect service
data flow. That equally applies to unicast and multicast routing
protocols.
[RFC7761] is the current specification of the Protocol Independent
Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) for IPv4 and IPv6 networks.
Confirming implementation of PIM-SM elects a Designated Router (DR)
on each PIM-SM interface. When a group of PIM-SM nodes is connected
to shared-media segment, e.g., Ethernet, the one elected as DR is to
act on behalf of directly connected hosts in the context of the PIM-
SM protocol. Failure of the DR impacts the quality of the multicast
services it provides to directly connected hosts because the default
failure detection interval for PIM-SM routers is 105 seconds.
Introduction of Backup DR (BDR), proposed in
[I-D.ietf-pim-dr-improvement], improves convergence time in the PIM-
SM over shared-media segment but still depends on long failure
detection interval.
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) [RFC5880] had been
originally defined to detect failure of point-to-point (p2p) paths -
Show full document text