Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Fibre Channel Traffic over MPLS Networks
draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-encap-16
Yes
(Stewart Bryant)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2011-04-25)
Unknown
Section 3.1 Although you say: The fragmentation bits (bits 8-9) are not used by the FC PW protocol. These bits may be used in the future for FC specific indications as defined in [RFC4385]. It appears from the diagram that you require these bits to be set to zero, and I suspect that a future extension might interpret the bits. I think you should be more explicit in the text. === Nits Section 1 "the TCP protocol" The P in TCP stands for what? :-) --- Section 1.1 s/port on far end of the FC link/port on the far end of the FC link/
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-28)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-27)
Unknown
I don't think this is worthy of a discuss, but is the byte order for FC PW Control Word (and other items) specified? Does it need to be in this document?
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-04-23)
Unknown
NSP is used without expansion.
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown