Updates to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs
draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-11

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (teas WG)
Last updated 2017-08-03
Replaces draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Reviews SECDIR, GENART will not review this version
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Vishnu Beeram
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2017-03-24)
IESG IESG state IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Has a DISCUSS. Has enough positions to pass once DISCUSS positions are resolved.
Responsible AD Deborah Brungard
Send notices to (None)
IANA IANA review state Version Changed - Review Needed
IANA action state None
TEAS Working Group                                            M. Taillon
Internet-Draft                                              T. Saad, Ed.
Updates: 4090                                             R. Gandhi, Ed.
Intended Status: Standards Track                                  Z. Ali
Expires: February 4, 2018                            Cisco Systems, Inc.
                                                               M. Bhatia
                                                                   Nokia
                                                          August 3, 2017

    Updates to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of
                  Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs
             draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-11

Abstract

   This document updates the Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic
   Engineering (RSVP-TE) Fast Reroute (FRR) procedures defined in RFC
   4090 to support Packet Switched Capable (PSC) Generalized Multi-
   Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs).  These
   updates allow the coordination of a bidirectional bypass tunnel
   assignment protecting a common facility in both forward and reverse
   directions of a co-routed bidirectional LSP.  In addition, these
   updates enable the re-direction of bidirectional traffic onto bypass
   tunnels that ensure co-routedness of data paths in the forward and
   reverse directions after FRR and avoid RSVP soft-state timeout in
   control-plane.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

Copyright Notice

 

Taillon et al.          Expires February 4, 2018                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           FRR for TE GMPLS LSPs            August 3, 2017

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
   2.  Conventions Used in This Document  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     2.1.  Key Word Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     2.2.  Terminology  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     2.3.  Abbreviations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
   3.  Fast Reroute For Unidirectional GMPLS LSPs . . . . . . . . . .  6
   4.  Bypass Tunnel Assignment For Bidirectional GMPLS LSPs  . . . .  6
     4.1.  Bidirectional GMPLS Bypass Tunnel Direction  . . . . . . .  7
     4.2.  Merge Point Labels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     4.3.  Merge Point Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     4.4.  RRO IPv4/IPv6 Subobject Flags  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     4.5.  Bidirectional Bypass Tunnel Assignment Co-ordination . . .  8
       4.5.1.  Bidirectional Bypass Tunnel Assignment Signaling
               Procedure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
       4.5.2.  One-to-one Bidirectional Bypass Tunnel Assignment  . .  9
       4.5.3.  Multiple Bidirectional Bypass Tunnel Assignments . . . 10
   5.  Fast Reroute For Bidirectional GMPLS LSPs with In-band
       Signaling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     5.1.  Link Protection for Bidirectional GMPLS LSPs . . . . . . . 11
       5.1.1.  Behavior After Link Failure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
       5.1.2.  Revertive Behavior After Fast Reroute  . . . . . . . . 12
     5.2.  Node Protection for Bidirectional GMPLS LSPs . . . . . . . 12
       5.2.1.  Behavior After Link Failure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
       5.2.2.  Behavior After Link Failure To Re-coroute  . . . . . . 13
         5.2.2.1.  Re-coroute in Data-plane After Link Failure  . . . 14
       5.2.3.  Revertive Behavior After Fast Reroute  . . . . . . . . 15
Show full document text