The scrypt Password-Based Key Derivation Function
draft-josefsson-scrypt-kdf-05

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2016-05-20 (latest revision 2016-05-18)
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats plain text xml pdf html bibtex
Stream WG state (None)
Document shepherd Rich Salz
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2015-07-04)
IESG IESG state RFC Ed Queue
Consensus Boilerplate Yes
Telechat date
Responsible AD Stephen Farrell
Send notices to (None)
IANA IANA review state Version Changed - Review Needed
IANA action state No IC
RFC Editor RFC Editor state AUTH48
Network Working Group                                        C. Percival
Internet-Draft                                                   Tarsnap
Intended status: Informational                              S. Josefsson
Expires: November 19, 2016                                        SJD AB
                                                            May 18, 2016

           The scrypt Password-Based Key Derivation Function
                     draft-josefsson-scrypt-kdf-05

Abstract

   This document specifies the password-based key derivation function
   scrypt.  The function derives one or more secret keys from a secret
   string.  It is based on memory-hard functions which offer added
   protection against attacks using custom hardware.  The document also
   provides an ASN.1 schema.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 19, 2016.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Scrypt Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  The Salsa20/8 Core Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   4.  The scryptBlockMix Algorithm  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  The scryptROMix Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  The scrypt Algorithm  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   7.  ASN.1 Syntax  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     7.1.  ASN.1 Module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
   8.  Test Vectors for Salsa20/8 Core . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   9.  Test Vectors for scryptBlockMix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   10. Test Vectors for scryptROMix  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10
   11. Test Vectors for PBKDF2 with HMAC-SHA-256 . . . . . . . . . .  11
   12. Test Vectors for scrypt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
   13. Test Vectors for PKCS#8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   14. Copying Conditions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   15. Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   16. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   17. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   18. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     18.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
     18.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15

1.  Introduction

   Password-based key derivation functions are used in cryptography and
   security protocols for deriving one or more secret keys from a secret
   value.  Over the years, several password-based key derivation
   functions have been used, including the original DES-based UNIX
   Crypt-function, FreeBSD MD5 crypt, PKCS#5 PBKDF2 [RFC2898] (typically
   used with SHA-1), GNU SHA-256/512 crypt [SHA2CRYPT], Windows NT LAN
   Manager (NTLM) [NTLM] hash, and the Blowfish-based bcrypt [BCRYPT].
   These algorithms are all based on a cryptographic primitive combined
   with salting and/or iteration.  The iteration count is used to slow
   down the computation, and the salt is used to make pre-computation
   costlier.

   All password-based key derivation functions mentioned above share the
   same weakness against powerful attackers.  Providing that the number
   of iterations used is increased as computer systems get faster, this
   allows legitimate users to spend a constant amount of time on key
   derivation without losing ground to an attackers' ever-increasing
   computing power - as long as attackers are limited to the same

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   software implementations as legitimate users.  While parallelized
   hardware implementations may not change the number of operations
   performed compared to software implementations, this does not prevent
   them from dramatically changing the asymptotic cost, since in many
   contexts - including the embarrassingly parallel task of performing a
   brute-force search for a passphrase - dollar-seconds are the most
   appropriate units for measuring the cost of a computation.  As
   semiconductor technology develops, circuits do not merely become
   faster; they also become smaller, allowing for a larger amount of
   parallelism at the same cost.

   Consequently, existing key derivation algorithms, even when the
   iteration count is increased so that the time taken to verify a
   password remains constant, the cost of finding a password by using a
   brute force attack implemented in hardware drops each year.

   The scrypt function aims to reduce the advantage which attackers can
   gain by using custom-designed parallel circuits for breaking
   password-based key derivation functions.

   This document do not introduce scrypt for the first time.  The
   original scrypt paper [SCRYPT] was published as a peer-reviewed
   scientific paper, and contains further background and discussions.

   The purpose of this document is to serve as a stable reference for
   IETF documents making use of scrypt.  The rest of this document is
   divided into sections that each describe parameter choices and
   algorithm steps needed for the final "scrypt" algorithm.

2.  Scrypt Parameters

   The scrypt function takes several parameters.  The passphrase P is
   typically a human-chosen password.  The salt is normally uniquely and
   randomly generated [RFC4086].  The parameter r ("blockSize") specify
   the block size.  The CPU/Memory cost parameter N ("costParameter")
   must be larger than 1, a power of 2 and less than 2^(128 * r / 8).
   The parallelization parameter p ("parallelizationParameter"), a
   positive integer less than or equal to ((2^32-1) * 32) / (128 * r).
   The intended output length dkLen in octets of the derived key
   ("keyLength"); a positive integer less than or equal to (2^32 - 1) *
   32.

   Users of scrypt can tune the parameters N, r, and p according to the
   amount of memory and computing power available, the latency-bandwidth
   product of the memory subsystem, and the amount of parallelism
   desired.  At the current time, taking r=8 and p=1 appears to yield
   good results, but as memory latency and CPU parallelism increase it
   is likely that the optimum values for both r and p will increase.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 3]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   Note also that since the computations of SMix are independent, a
   large value of p can be used to increase the computational cost of
   scrypt without increasing the memory usage; so we can expect scrypt
   to remain useful even if the growth rates of CPU power and memory
   capacity diverge.

3.  The Salsa20/8 Core Function

   Salsa20/8 Core is a round-reduced variant of the Salsa20 Core.  It is
   a hash function from 64-octet strings to 64-octet strings.  Note that
   Salsa20/8 Core is not a cryptographic hash function since it is not
   collision-resistant.  See section 8 of [SALSA20SPEC] for its
   specification, and [SALSA20CORE] for more information.  The algorithm
   description, in C language, is included below as a stable reference,
   without endianness conversion and alignment.

   #define R(a,b) (((a) << (b)) | ((a) >> (32 - (b))))
   void salsa20_word_specification(uint32 out[16],uint32 in[16])
   {
     int i;
     uint32 x[16];
     for (i = 0;i < 16;++i) x[i] = in[i];
     for (i = 8;i > 0;i -= 2) {
       x[ 4] ^= R(x[ 0]+x[12], 7);  x[ 8] ^= R(x[ 4]+x[ 0], 9);
       x[12] ^= R(x[ 8]+x[ 4],13);  x[ 0] ^= R(x[12]+x[ 8],18);
       x[ 9] ^= R(x[ 5]+x[ 1], 7);  x[13] ^= R(x[ 9]+x[ 5], 9);
       x[ 1] ^= R(x[13]+x[ 9],13);  x[ 5] ^= R(x[ 1]+x[13],18);
       x[14] ^= R(x[10]+x[ 6], 7);  x[ 2] ^= R(x[14]+x[10], 9);
       x[ 6] ^= R(x[ 2]+x[14],13);  x[10] ^= R(x[ 6]+x[ 2],18);
       x[ 3] ^= R(x[15]+x[11], 7);  x[ 7] ^= R(x[ 3]+x[15], 9);
       x[11] ^= R(x[ 7]+x[ 3],13);  x[15] ^= R(x[11]+x[ 7],18);
       x[ 1] ^= R(x[ 0]+x[ 3], 7);  x[ 2] ^= R(x[ 1]+x[ 0], 9);
       x[ 3] ^= R(x[ 2]+x[ 1],13);  x[ 0] ^= R(x[ 3]+x[ 2],18);
       x[ 6] ^= R(x[ 5]+x[ 4], 7);  x[ 7] ^= R(x[ 6]+x[ 5], 9);
       x[ 4] ^= R(x[ 7]+x[ 6],13);  x[ 5] ^= R(x[ 4]+x[ 7],18);
       x[11] ^= R(x[10]+x[ 9], 7);  x[ 8] ^= R(x[11]+x[10], 9);
       x[ 9] ^= R(x[ 8]+x[11],13);  x[10] ^= R(x[ 9]+x[ 8],18);
       x[12] ^= R(x[15]+x[14], 7);  x[13] ^= R(x[12]+x[15], 9);
       x[14] ^= R(x[13]+x[12],13);  x[15] ^= R(x[14]+x[13],18);
     }
     for (i = 0;i < 16;++i) out[i] = x[i] + in[i];
   }

4.  The scryptBlockMix Algorithm

   The scryptBlockMix algorithm is the same as the BlockMix algorithm
   described in [SCRYPT] but with Salsa20/8 Core used as the hash

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 4]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   function H.  Below, Salsa(T) corresponds to the Salsa20/8 Core
   function applied to the octet vector T.

   Algorithm scryptBlockMix

   Parameters:
            r       Block size parameter.

   Input:
            B[0] || B[1] || ... || B[2 * r - 1]
                   Input octet string (of size 128 * r octets),
                   treated as 2 * r 64-octet blocks,
                   where each element in B is a 64-octet block.

   Output:
            B'[0] || B'[1] || ... || B'[2 * r - 1]
                   Output octet string.

   Steps:

     1. X = B[2 * r - 1]

     2. for i = 0 to 2 * r - 1 do
          T = X xor B[i]
          X = Salsa (T)
          Y[i] = X
        end for

     3. B' = (Y[0], Y[2], ..., Y[2 * r - 2],
              Y[1], Y[3], ..., Y[2 * r - 1])

5.  The scryptROMix Algorithm

   The scryptROMix algorithm is the same as the ROMix algorithm
   described in [SCRYPT] but with scryptBlockMix used as the hash
   function H and the Integerify function explained inline.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 5]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   Algorithm scryptROMix

   Input:
            r       Block size parameter.
            B       Input octet vector of length 128 * r octets.
            N       CPU/Memory cost parameter, must be larger than 1,
                    a power of 2 and less than 2^(128 * r / 8).

   Output:
            B'      Output octet vector of length 128 * r octets.

   Steps:

     1. X = B

     2. for i = 0 to N - 1 do
          V[i] = X
          X = scryptBlockMix (X)
        end for

     3. for i = 0 to N - 1 do
          j = Integerify (X) mod N
                 where Integerify (B[0] ... B[2 * r - 1]) is defined
                 as the result of interpreting B[2 * r - 1] as a
                 little-endian integer.
          T = X xor V[j]
          X = scryptBlockMix (T)
        end for

     4. B' = X

6.  The scrypt Algorithm

   The PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 function used below denote the PBKDF2
   algorithm [RFC2898] used with HMAC-SHA-256 [RFC6234] as the PRF.  The
   HMAC-SHA-256 function generates 32 octet outputs.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 6]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

Algorithm scrypt

Input:
         P       Passphrase, an octet string.
         S       Salt, an octet string.
         N       CPU/Memory cost parameter, must be larger than 1,
                 a power of 2 and less than 2^(128 * r / 8).
         r       Block size parameter.
         p       Parallelization parameter, a positive integer
                 less than or equal to ((2^32-1) * hLen) / MFLen
                 where hLen is 32 and MFlen is 128 * r.
         dkLen   Intended output length in octets of the derived
                 key; a positive integer less than or equal to
                 (2^32 - 1) * hLen where hLen is 32.

Output:
         DK      Derived key, of length dkLen octets.

Steps:

  1. Initialize an array B consisting of p blocks of 128 * r octets each:
     B[0] || B[1] || ... || B[p - 1] =
       PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 (P, S, 1, p * 128 * r)

  2. for i = 0 to p - 1 do
       B[i] = scryptROMix (r, B[i], N)
     end for

  3. DK = PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 (P, B[0] || B[1] || ... || B[p - 1],
                              1, dkLen)

7.  ASN.1 Syntax

   This section defines ASN.1 syntax for the scrypt key derivation
   function.  This is intended to operate on the same abstraction level
   as PKCS#5's PBKDF2.  The OID id-scrypt below can be used where id-
   PBKDF2 is used, with scrypt-params corresponding to PBKDF2-params.
   The intended application of these definitions includes PKCS #8 and
   other syntax for key management.

   The object identifier id-scrypt identifies the scrypt key derivation
   function.

   id-scrypt OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {1 3 6 1 4 1 11591 4 11}

   The parameters field associated with this OID in an
   AlgorithmIdentifier shall have type scrypt-params:

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 7]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   scrypt-params ::= SEQUENCE {
          salt OCTET STRING,
          costParameter INTEGER (1..MAX),
          blockSize INTEGER (1..MAX),
          parallelizationParameter INTEGER (1..MAX),
          keyLength INTEGER (1..MAX) OPTIONAL }

   The fields of type scrypt-params have the following meanings:

   - salt specifies the salt value.  It shall be an octet string.

   - costParameter specifies the CPU/Memory cost parameter N.

   - blockSize specifies the block size parameter r.

   - parallelizationParameter specifies the parallelization parameter.

   - keyLength, an optional field, is the length in octets of the
   derived key.  The maximum key length allowed depends on the
   implementation; it is expected that implementation profiles may
   further constrain the bounds.  This field only provides convenience;
   the key length is not cryptographically protected.

   To be usable in PKCS#8 [RFC5208] and Asymmetric Key Packages
   [RFC5958] the following extension of the PBES2-KDFs type is needed.

      PBES2-KDFs ALGORITHM-IDENTIFIER ::=
          { {scrypt-params IDENTIFIED BY id-scrypt}, ... }

7.1.  ASN.1 Module

   For reference purposes, the ASN.1 syntax is presented as an ASN.1
   module here.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 8]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   -- scrypt ASN.1 Module

   scrypt-0 {1 3 6 1 4 1 11591 4 10}

   DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN

   id-scrypt OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {1 3 6 1 4 1 11591 4 11}

   scrypt-params ::= SEQUENCE {
       salt OCTET STRING,
       costParameter INTEGER (1..MAX),
       blockSize INTEGER (1..MAX),
       parallelizationParameter INTEGER (1..MAX),
       keyLength INTEGER (1..MAX) OPTIONAL
   }

   PBES2-KDFs ALGORITHM-IDENTIFIER ::=
          { {scrypt-params IDENTIFIED BY id-scrypt}, ... }

   END

8.  Test Vectors for Salsa20/8 Core

   Below is a sequence of octets to illustrate input and output values
   for the Salsa20/8 Core.  The octets are hex encoded and whitespace is
   inserted for readability.  The value corresponds to the first input
   and output pair generated by the first scrypt test vector below.

   INPUT:
   7e 87 9a 21 4f 3e c9 86 7c a9 40 e6 41 71 8f 26
   ba ee 55 5b 8c 61 c1 b5 0d f8 46 11 6d cd 3b 1d
   ee 24 f3 19 df 9b 3d 85 14 12 1e 4b 5a c5 aa 32
   76 02 1d 29 09 c7 48 29 ed eb c6 8d b8 b8 c2 5e

   OUTPUT:
   a4 1f 85 9c 66 08 cc 99 3b 81 ca cb 02 0c ef 05
   04 4b 21 81 a2 fd 33 7d fd 7b 1c 63 96 68 2f 29
   b4 39 31 68 e3 c9 e6 bc fe 6b c5 b7 a0 6d 96 ba
   e4 24 cc 10 2c 91 74 5c 24 ad 67 3d c7 61 8f 81

9.  Test Vectors for scryptBlockMix

   Below is a sequence of octets to illustrate input and output values
   for scryptBlockMix.  The test vector uses an r value of 1.  The
   octets are hex encoded and whitespace is inserted for readability.
   The value corresponds to the first input and output pair generated by
   the first scrypt test vector below.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016               [Page 9]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   INPUT
   B[0] =  f7 ce 0b 65 3d 2d 72 a4 10 8c f5 ab e9 12 ff dd
           77 76 16 db bb 27 a7 0e 82 04 f3 ae 2d 0f 6f ad
           89 f6 8f 48 11 d1 e8 7b cc 3b d7 40 0a 9f fd 29
           09 4f 01 84 63 95 74 f3 9a e5 a1 31 52 17 bc d7

   B[1] =  89 49 91 44 72 13 bb 22 6c 25 b5 4d a8 63 70 fb
           cd 98 43 80 37 46 66 bb 8f fc b5 bf 40 c2 54 b0
           67 d2 7c 51 ce 4a d5 fe d8 29 c9 0b 50 5a 57 1b
           7f 4d 1c ad 6a 52 3c da 77 0e 67 bc ea af 7e 89

   OUTPUT
   B'[0] = a4 1f 85 9c 66 08 cc 99 3b 81 ca cb 02 0c ef 05
           04 4b 21 81 a2 fd 33 7d fd 7b 1c 63 96 68 2f 29
           b4 39 31 68 e3 c9 e6 bc fe 6b c5 b7 a0 6d 96 ba
           e4 24 cc 10 2c 91 74 5c 24 ad 67 3d c7 61 8f 81

   B'[1] = 20 ed c9 75 32 38 81 a8 05 40 f6 4c 16 2d cd 3c
           21 07 7c fe 5f 8d 5f e2 b1 a4 16 8f 95 36 78 b7
           7d 3b 3d 80 3b 60 e4 ab 92 09 96 e5 9b 4d 53 b6
           5d 2a 22 58 77 d5 ed f5 84 2c b9 f1 4e ef e4 25

10.  Test Vectors for scryptROMix

   Below is a sequence of octets to illustrate input and output values
   for scryptROMix.  The test vector uses an r value of 1 and an N value
   of 16.  The octets are hex encoded and whitespace is inserted for
   readability.  The value corresponds to the first input and output
   pair generated by the first scrypt test vector below.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016              [Page 10]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   INPUT:
   B = f7 ce 0b 65 3d 2d 72 a4 10 8c f5 ab e9 12 ff dd
       77 76 16 db bb 27 a7 0e 82 04 f3 ae 2d 0f 6f ad
       89 f6 8f 48 11 d1 e8 7b cc 3b d7 40 0a 9f fd 29
       09 4f 01 84 63 95 74 f3 9a e5 a1 31 52 17 bc d7
       89 49 91 44 72 13 bb 22 6c 25 b5 4d a8 63 70 fb
       cd 98 43 80 37 46 66 bb 8f fc b5 bf 40 c2 54 b0
       67 d2 7c 51 ce 4a d5 fe d8 29 c9 0b 50 5a 57 1b
       7f 4d 1c ad 6a 52 3c da 77 0e 67 bc ea af 7e 89

   OUTPUT:
   B = 79 cc c1 93 62 9d eb ca 04 7f 0b 70 60 4b f6 b6
       2c e3 dd 4a 96 26 e3 55 fa fc 61 98 e6 ea 2b 46
       d5 84 13 67 3b 99 b0 29 d6 65 c3 57 60 1f b4 26
       a0 b2 f4 bb a2 00 ee 9f 0a 43 d1 9b 57 1a 9c 71
       ef 11 42 e6 5d 5a 26 6f dd ca 83 2c e5 9f aa 7c
       ac 0b 9c f1 be 2b ff ca 30 0d 01 ee 38 76 19 c4
       ae 12 fd 44 38 f2 03 a0 e4 e1 c4 7e c3 14 86 1f
       4e 90 87 cb 33 39 6a 68 73 e8 f9 d2 53 9a 4b 8e

11.  Test Vectors for PBKDF2 with HMAC-SHA-256

   Below is a sequence of octets illustring input and output values for
   PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256.  The octets are hex encoded and whitespace is
   inserted for readability.  The test vectors below can be used to
   verify the PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 [RFC2898] function.  The password and
   salt strings are passed as sequences of ASCII [RFC0020] octets.

   PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 (P="passwd", S="salt",
                       c=1, dkLen=64) =
   55 ac 04 6e 56 e3 08 9f ec 16 91 c2 25 44 b6 05
   f9 41 85 21 6d de 04 65 e6 8b 9d 57 c2 0d ac bc
   49 ca 9c cc f1 79 b6 45 99 16 64 b3 9d 77 ef 31
   7c 71 b8 45 b1 e3 0b d5 09 11 20 41 d3 a1 97 83

   PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-256 (P="Password", S="NaCl",
                        c=80000, dkLen=64) =
   4d dc d8 f6 0b 98 be 21 83 0c ee 5e f2 27 01 f9
   64 1a 44 18 d0 4c 04 14 ae ff 08 87 6b 34 ab 56
   a1 d4 25 a1 22 58 33 54 9a db 84 1b 51 c9 b3 17
   6a 27 2b de bb a1 d0 78 47 8f 62 b3 97 f3 3c 8d

12.  Test Vectors for scrypt

   For reference purposes, we provide the following test vectors for
   scrypt, where the password and salt strings are passed as sequences
   of ASCII [RFC0020] octets.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016              [Page 11]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   The parameters to the scrypt function below are, in order, the
   password P (octet string), the salt S (octet string), the CPU/Memory
   cost parameter N, the block size parameter r, and the parallelization
   parameter p, and the output size dkLen.  The output is hex encoded
   and whitespace is inserted for readability.

   scrypt (P="", S="",
           N=16, r=1, p=1, dklen=64) =
   77 d6 57 62 38 65 7b 20 3b 19 ca 42 c1 8a 04 97
   f1 6b 48 44 e3 07 4a e8 df df fa 3f ed e2 14 42
   fc d0 06 9d ed 09 48 f8 32 6a 75 3a 0f c8 1f 17
   e8 d3 e0 fb 2e 0d 36 28 cf 35 e2 0c 38 d1 89 06

   scrypt (P="password", S="NaCl",
           N=1024, r=8, p=16, dkLen=64) =
   fd ba be 1c 9d 34 72 00 78 56 e7 19 0d 01 e9 fe
   7c 6a d7 cb c8 23 78 30 e7 73 76 63 4b 37 31 62
   2e af 30 d9 2e 22 a3 88 6f f1 09 27 9d 98 30 da
   c7 27 af b9 4a 83 ee 6d 83 60 cb df a2 cc 06 40

   scrypt (P="pleaseletmein", S="SodiumChloride",
           N=16384, r=8, p=1, dkLen=64) =
   70 23 bd cb 3a fd 73 48 46 1c 06 cd 81 fd 38 eb
   fd a8 fb ba 90 4f 8e 3e a9 b5 43 f6 54 5d a1 f2
   d5 43 29 55 61 3f 0f cf 62 d4 97 05 24 2a 9a f9
   e6 1e 85 dc 0d 65 1e 40 df cf 01 7b 45 57 58 87

   scrypt (P="pleaseletmein", S="SodiumChloride",
           N=1048576, r=8, p=1, dkLen=64) =
   21 01 cb 9b 6a 51 1a ae ad db be 09 cf 70 f8 81
   ec 56 8d 57 4a 2f fd 4d ab e5 ee 98 20 ad aa 47
   8e 56 fd 8f 4b a5 d0 9f fa 1c 6d 92 7c 40 f4 c3
   37 30 40 49 e8 a9 52 fb cb f4 5c 6f a7 7a 41 a4

13.  Test Vectors for PKCS#8

   PKCS#8 [RFC5208] and Asymmetric Key Packages [RFC5958] encode
   encrypted private-keys.  Using PBES2 with scrypt as the KDF, the
   following illustrates an example of a PKCS#8 encoded private-key.
   The password is "Rabbit" (without the quotes) with N=1048576, r=8 and
   p=1.  The salt is "Mouse" and the encryption algorithm used is
   aes256-CBC.  The derived key is: E2 77 EA 2C AC B2 3E DA-FC 03 9D 22
   9B 79 DC 13 EC ED B6 01 D9 9B 18 2A-9F ED BA 1E 2B FB 4F 58.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016              [Page 12]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   -----BEGIN ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-----
   MIHiME0GCSqGSIb3DQEFDTBAMB8GCSsGAQQB2kcECzASBAVNb3VzZQIDEAAAAgEI
   AgEBMB0GCWCGSAFlAwQBKgQQyYmguHMsOwzGMPoyObk/JgSBkJb47EWd5iAqJlyy
   +ni5ftd6gZgOPaLQClL7mEZc2KQay0VhjZm/7MbBUNbqOAXNM6OGebXxVp6sHUAL
   iBGY/Dls7B1TsWeGObE0sS1MXEpuREuloZjcsNVcNXWPlLdZtkSH6uwWzR0PyG/Z
   +ZXfNodZtd/voKlvLOw5B3opGIFaLkbtLZQwMiGtl42AS89lZg==
   -----END ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-----

14.  Copying Conditions

   The authors agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to
   copy, use and distribute this entire document or any portion of it,
   with or without modification, in any medium, without royalty,
   provided that, unless separate permission is granted, redistributed
   modified works do not contain misleading author, version, name of
   work, or endorsement information.

15.  Acknowledgements

   Text in this document was borrowed from [SCRYPT] and [RFC2898].  The
   PKCS#8 test vector was provided by Stephen N.  Henson.

   Feedback on this document were received from Dmitry Chestnykh,
   Alexander Klink, Rob Kendrick, Royce Williams Ted Rolle, Jr., Eitan
   Adler, Stephen Farrel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, and Paul Kyzivat.

16.  IANA Considerations

   None.

17.  Security Considerations

   This document specifies a cryptographic algorithm, and there is
   always a risk that someone will find a weakness in it.  By following
   the cryptographic research area you may learn of publications
   relevant to scrypt.

   ROMix has been proven sequential memory-hard under the Random Oracle
   model for the hash function.  The security of scrypt relies on the
   assumption that BlockMix with Salsa20/8 Core does not exhibit any
   "shortcuts" which would allow it to be iterated more easily than a
   random oracle.  For other claims about the security properties see
   [SCRYPT].

   Passwords and other sensitive data, such as intermediate values, may
   continue to be stored in memory, core dumps, swap areas, etc, for a
   long time after the implementation has processed them.  This makes
   attacks on the implementation easier.  Thus, implementation should

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016              [Page 13]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   consider storing sensitive data in protected memory areas.  How to
   achieve this is system dependent.

   By nature and depending on parameters, running the scrypt algorithm
   may require large amounts of memory.  Systems should protect against
   a denial of service attack resulting from attackers presenting
   unreasonably large parameters.

   Poor parameter choices can be harmful for security; for example, if
   you tune the parameters so that memory use is reduced to small
   amounts that will affect the properties of the algorithm.

18.  References

18.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2898]  Kaliski, B., "PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography
              Specification Version 2.0", RFC 2898,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2898, September 2000,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2898>.

   [RFC6234]  Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
              (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6234, May 2011,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6234>.

18.2.  Informative References

   [RFC0020]  Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", STD 80,
              RFC 20, DOI 10.17487/RFC0020, October 1969,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc20>.

   [RFC5208]  Kaliski, B., "Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) #8:
              Private-Key Information Syntax Specification Version 1.2",
              RFC 5208, DOI 10.17487/RFC5208, May 2008,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5208>.

   [RFC5958]  Turner, S., "Asymmetric Key Packages", RFC 5958,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5958, August 2010,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5958>.

   [RFC4086]  Eastlake 3rd, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker,
              "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4086>.

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016              [Page 14]
Internet-Draft                   scrypt                         May 2016

   [SALSA20SPEC]
              Bernstein, D., "Salsa20 specification",
              WWW http://cr.yp.to/snuffle/spec.pdf, April 2005.

   [SALSA20CORE]
              Bernstein, D., "The Salsa20 Core",
              WWW http://cr.yp.to/salsa20.html, March 2005.

   [SCRYPT]   Percival, C., "Stronger key derivation via sequential
              memory-hard functions",
              BSDCan'09 http://www.tarsnap.com/scrypt/scrypt.pdf, May
              2009.

   [BCRYPT]   Provos, N. and D. Mazieres, "A Future-Adaptable Password
              Scheme", USENIX 1999
              https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/usenix99/provos/
              provos.pdf, June 1999.

   [NTLM]     "[MS-NLMP]: NT LAN Manager (NTLM) Authentication
              Protocol", Microsoft https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
              us/library/cc236621.aspx, 2015.

   [SHA2CRYPT]
              Drepper, U., "Unix crypt using SHA-256 and SHA-512",
              URL http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/SHA-crypt.txt, April
              2008.

Authors' Addresses

   Colin Percival
   Tarsnap

   Email: cperciva@tarsnap.com

   Simon Josefsson
   SJD AB

   Email: simon@josefsson.org
   URI:   http://josefsson.org/

Percival & Josefsson    Expires November 19, 2016              [Page 15]