Registration of Second-Level URN Namespaces under "ietf"
draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-02
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2013-04-09
|
02 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2013-04-03
|
02 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2013-03-04
|
02 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2013-02-27
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2013-02-26
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2013-02-26
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2013-02-26
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2013-02-26
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2013-02-25
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2013-02-25
|
02 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2013-02-25
|
02 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2013-02-25
|
02 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2013-02-25
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2013-02-25
|
02 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2013-02-25
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2013-02-25
|
02 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-02-23
|
02 | Pete Resnick | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-02-23
|
02 | Pete Resnick | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-02-21
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2013-02-21
|
02 | Cindy Morgan | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection by Cindy Morgan |
2013-02-20
|
02 | Wesley Eddy | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy |
2013-02-20
|
02 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica |
2013-02-19
|
02 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2013-02-19
|
02 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2013-02-19
|
02 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2013-02-18
|
02 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley |
2013-02-18
|
02 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2013-02-17
|
02 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms |
2013-02-17
|
02 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2013-02-15
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] Seems a little OTT to prescribe the page layout for the new registry, maybe s/will appear/should appear/ or something might be better and … [Ballot comment] Seems a little OTT to prescribe the page layout for the new registry, maybe s/will appear/should appear/ or something might be better and save a later pedantic update to this. |
2013-02-15
|
02 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot discuss] As far as I can tell, this document doesn't Update the two RFCs it points to. These look like the "See Also" use … [Ballot discuss] As far as I can tell, this document doesn't Update the two RFCs it points to. These look like the "See Also" use of Updates we've agreed not to use. Am I missing something it changes in the earlier RFCs? If so, could that be written more clearly? |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Robert Sparks |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Hilarie Orman. |
2013-02-14
|
02 | Barry Leiba | New version available: draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-02.txt |
2013-02-13
|
01 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot comment] I can actually ballot YES on an applications document! :) |
2013-02-13
|
01 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2013-02-11
|
01 | Pete Resnick | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2013-02-11
|
01 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2013-02-11
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Ballot has been issued |
2013-02-11
|
01 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2013-02-11
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Created "Approve" ballot |
2013-02-11
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-02-11
|
01 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2013-02-08
|
01 | Pearl Liang | IANA has reviewed draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-01 and has the following comments: We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are two actions which IANA must complete. … IANA has reviewed draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-01 and has the following comments: We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are two actions which IANA must complete. First, on the IANA Matrix located at: http://www.iana.org/protocols there is currently a top-level registry group called "IETF Protocol Parameter Identifiers", which contains one registry, "IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters". IANA will rename the group "IETF Protocol Parameter Identifiers", giving it the new name "Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for IETF Use". We understand that the existing registry in that group will remain, and its name will be unchanged. Second, a new registry will be added to the group now named "Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for IETF Use". The new registry will be called "IETF URN Sub-namespaces", and new registrations will use the "IETF Review" policy as defined in RFC 5226 [RFC5226]. The new registry will appear first in the group, to provide a human-friendly, top-down resolution of the namespace hierarchy. There are initial registrations in the new registry. The new registry will appear as follows: IETF URN Sub-namespaces Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review Reference: [ RFC-to-be ] Note: This is the Official Registry for sub-namespaces of the 'IETF' URN Namespace. Sub-namespace | Reference | IANA Registry Reference --------------+-----------+----------------------------------------- rfc | [RFC2648] | none fyi | [RFC2648] | none std | [RFC2648] | none bcp | [RFC2648] | none id | [RFC2648] | none mtg | [RFC2648] | none params | [RFC3553] | [http://www.iana.org/assignments/params] --------------+-----------+----------------------------------------- We understand that these two actions are the only ones required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. |
2013-01-17
|
01 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2013-01-17
|
01 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2013-01-17
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hilarie Orman |
2013-01-17
|
01 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hilarie Orman |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: (Registration of Second-Level URI Namespaces Under "ietf") … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: (Registration of Second-Level URI Namespaces Under "ietf") to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Registration of Second-Level URI Namespaces Under "ietf"' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-02-11. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract RFC 2648 defines the "ietf" URN namespace, and defines a number of sub-namespaces. RFC 3553 defines an additional sub-namespace, "params", and creates a registry to document allocations under that. But there is no registry that lists, in one place, all sub-namespaces of "ietf". This document creates and populates such a registry. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Amy Vezza | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-02-21 |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Last call was requested |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Ballot writeup was generated |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | Last call announcement was generated |
2013-01-14
|
01 | Pete Resnick | State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2013-01-07
|
01 | Barry Leiba | New version available: draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-01.txt |
2013-01-04
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | 1. Summary Barry Leiba is serving as the document shepherd as well as author of this simple document. Pete Resnick is the responsible Area Director. … 1. Summary Barry Leiba is serving as the document shepherd as well as author of this simple document. Pete Resnick is the responsible Area Director. RFC 2648 defines the "ietf" URN namespace, and defines a number of sub-namespaces. RFC 3553 defines an additional sub-namespace, "params", and creates a registry to document allocations under that. But there is no registry that lists, in one place, all sub-namespaces of "ietf". This Informational document creates and populates such a registry. 2. Review and Consensus This document originates from a note to IANA by Alfred H�nes, in which Alfred noted the absence of the subject registry. IANA asked Barry, as the AD responsible for the urnbis working group, and Barry agreed that such a registry is needed. Because this is outside the urnbis charter, Barry is pursuing this as an individual submission. There has so far been no other discussion of this within the community; little discussion is expected, and any that happens will be during last call. This is a simple document that's addressing a procedural oversight, and no special reviews are necessary. 3. Intellectual Property The author confirms that to his personal knowledge, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79, there is no IPR related to this document. 4. Other Points This document creates a new IANA registry to hold URN sub-namespaces under the "ietf" namespace. Existing such namespaces include "urn:ietf:rfc:", "urn:ietf:std:", and "urn:ietf:params:". All of the existing namespaces are entered into the new registry by this document, and future registrations are defined as requiring IETF Review. This policy seems appropriate for top-level sub-namespaces controlled by the IETF, and is in the spirit of RFC 2648. This document updates RFCs 2648 and 3553, for two reasons: (1) It registers the sub-namespaces created in those documents and the establishment of the registry needs to be noted by readers of those documents, and (2) RFC 2648 itself implies that if new sub-namespaces are created, RFC 2648 will need to be updated. |
2013-01-04
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Note added 'Barry Leiba (barryleiba@computer.org) is serving as the document shepherd as well as author.' |
2013-01-04
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Intended Status changed to Informational |
2013-01-04
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2013-01-04
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Stream changed to IETF from None |
2013-01-03
|
00 | Barry Leiba | New version available: draft-leiba-urnbis-ietf-namespace-00.txt |