Domain Names, A Case for Clarifying
draft-lewis-domain-names-10

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2018-07-30 (latest revision 2018-01-26)
Stream ISE
Intended RFC status Informational
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream ISE state In ISE Review
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Document shepherd No shepherd assigned
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-lewis-domain-names-10.txt

Abstract

Is the concept of Domain Names owned by the DNS protocol or does the DNS protocol exist to support the Domain Names concept? This question has become pertinent in light of proposals to use Domain Names in protocols in ways incompatible with the DNS protocol and the operational environment built to runthe protocol. This document looks first at the early record in the RFC series and then expands to survey how Domain Names are used in protocols and reaches the conclusion that Domain Names are independent of the DNS, and further, that there might be a need to clarify the definition of Domain Names to reinforce that notion.

Authors

Edward Lewis (edward.lewis@icann.org)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)