Redefining ELI considered harmful; NPL considered harmful
draft-li-mpls-redefining-eli-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Stewart Bryant , John Drake , Tony Li | ||
| Last updated | 2022-10-09 (Latest revision 2022-04-07) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Recent work on MPLS Network Actions (MNA) has produced two drafts that propose to redefine the MPLS Entropy Label Indicator (ELI) for use with MNA. [I-D.jags-mpls-ext-hdr] [I-D.gandhi-mpls-ioam] This work also proposes the use of a Network Programming Label (NPL) as another option for use with MNA. This document considers both of these options harmful in the sense of [GOTO].
Authors
Stewart Bryant
John Drake
Tony Li
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)