Updates to DNS64 Functionality Advertisement for DNS RA Option
draft-ma-6man-ra-dns64-flag-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Chenhao Ma , Chongfeng Xie | ||
| Last updated | 2025-08-29 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ma-6man-ra-dns64-flag-00
IPv6 Maintenance C. Ma
Internet-Draft C. Xie
Intended status: Standards Track China Telecom
Expires: 2 March 2026 29 August 2025
Updates to DNS64 Functionality Advertisement for DNS RA Option
draft-ma-6man-ra-dns64-flag-00
Abstract
This document defines a new flag in the DNS RA Option to advertise
the DNS64 functionality. This extension enables automatic
configuration of DNS64 resolution, improving deployability in IPv6
transition scenarios.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 March 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Ma & Xie Expires 2 March 2026 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft DNS64 flag for DNS RA Option August 2025
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. DNS64 Flag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Introduction
DNS Extensions for Network Address Translation from IPv6 clients to
IPv4 servers (DNS64)[RFC6147] is a widely deployed mechanism for
IPv6-only networks requiring access to IPv4-only services.
[I-D.ma-v6ops-5g-ipv6only]introduce the reasons for using RA to
deliver DNS64 address configuration. This document defines a new
flag in the DNS RA option[RFC8106] to communicate DNS64 server
address to hosts.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14[RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. DNS64 Flag
Based on [RFC8106], this specification introduces a 'T' flag bit
allocated in the leftmost bit of the Reserved field to signal the
presence of DNS64 server addresses in the option payload. Figure 1
shows the format of the DNS64 option.
Ma & Xie Expires 2 March 2026 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft DNS64 flag for DNS RA Option August 2025
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |T| Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Lifetime |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
| DNS64 Server Address(es) (128-bit IPv6) |
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1:DNS64 RA Option format
Fields:
* Type: 8-bit identifier: 25
* Length: 8-bit unsigned integer.
* Flag T: 1-bit integer. set to indicate DNS64 server addresses are
in the option payload.
* Lifetime: 32-bit unsigned integer.
* DNS64 Server Address(es): One or more 128-bit IPv6 addresses of
the DNS64.
3. Security Considerations
This memo does not introduce any new security problems.
Considerations are described in Section 7 in [RFC8106]
4. IANA Considerations
This document requests allocation for the Flag T.
5. Acknowledgements
The comments and suggestions of the following are gratefully
acknowledged:
6. References
6.1. Normative References
Ma & Xie Expires 2 March 2026 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft DNS64 flag for DNS RA Option August 2025
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4861] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman,
"Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4861, September 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4861>.
[RFC6147] Bagnulo, M., Sullivan, A., Matthews, P., and I. van
Beijnum, "DNS64: DNS Extensions for Network Address
Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers", RFC 6147,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6147, April 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6147>.
[RFC8106] Jeong, J., Park, S., Beloeil, L., and S. Madanapalli,
"IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration",
RFC 8106, DOI 10.17487/RFC8106, March 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8106>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
6.2. Informative References
[I-D.ma-v6ops-5g-ipv6only]
Ma, C. and C. Xie, "Considerations of Gradual IPv6-only
Deployment in 5G Mobile Networks", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ma-v6ops-5g-ipv6only-00, 26 February
2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ma-
v6ops-5g-ipv6only-00>.
Authors' Addresses
Chenhao Ma
China Telecom
Beiqijia Town, Changping District
Beijing
102209
China
Email: machh@chinatelecom.cn
Chongfeng Xie
China Telecom
Beiqijia Town, Changping District
Ma & Xie Expires 2 March 2026 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft DNS64 flag for DNS RA Option August 2025
Beijing
102209
China
Email: xiechf@cernet.edu.cn
Ma & Xie Expires 2 March 2026 [Page 5]