MLS Extension for Out-Of-Band Additional Authenticated Data
draft-mahy-oob-aad-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Rohan Mahy | ||
| Last updated | 2026-07-20 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-mahy-oob-aad-00
Network Working Group R. Mahy
Internet-Draft 21 July 2026
Intended status: Informational
Expires: 22 January 2027
MLS Extension for Out-Of-Band Additional Authenticated Data
draft-mahy-oob-aad-00
Abstract
This document specifies an explicit way to signal that the Additional
Authenticated Data does include or should include data elements that
are conveyed out-of-band (ex: are not in the MLS message).
About This Document
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
The latest revision of this draft can be found at
https://rohanmahy.github.io/mls-oob-aad/draft-mahy-oob-aad.html.
Status information for this document may be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mahy-oob-aad/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/rohanmahy/mls-oob-aad.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 22 January 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Mahy Expires 22 January 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft MLS Out-Of-Band AAD July 2026
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Introduction
The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol includes message types
with Additional Authenticated Data.
[I-D.pham-mls-additional-wire-formats] defined new MLS Wire Formats
for a similar purpose, however the Wire Format should be orthogonal
to out-of-band AAD functionality.
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Out-Of-Band AAD and In-Band AAD.
3. Mechanism
Mahy Expires 22 January 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft MLS Out-Of-Band AAD July 2026
struct {
opaque group_id<V>;
uint64 epoch;
ContentType content_type;
SafeAADItem oob_aad<V>; /* <== this is new */
opaque authenticated_data<V>; /* usually just SafeAAD */
} PrivateContentAAD;
struct {
ProtocolVersion version = mls10;
WireFormat wire_format;
FramedContent content; /* can contain SafeAAD */
SafeAADItem oob_aad<V>; /* <== this is new */
select (FramedContentTBS.content.sender.sender_type) {
case member:
case new_member_commit:
GroupContext context;
case external:
case new_member_proposal:
struct{};
};
} FramedContentTBS;
Consists of:
* a oob-aad extension type. This specification cannot be a "safe"
extension according to [I-D.ietf-mls-extensions] since it requires
the MLS stack to modify its behavior outside of the concept of the
specific components it also defines. The presence of the oob-aad
extension type in the GroupContext means that all members of the
group support the extensions and that if an out-of-band AAD
component is signaled, the members of the room will include its
actual value in Out-Of-Band AAD, without communicating it in the
authenticated_data.
* an default-oob-aad-component component type. When present in the
app_data_dictionary in the GroupContext, the out-of-band value of
each signaled as-needed component is also included in the Out-Of-
Band AAD.
* an as-needed-oob-aad-component component type.
- When present in the app_data_dictionary in the GroupContext it
enumerates OOB AAD that can be signaled on a per-message basis.
- When present as a SafeAadItem in the aad_items list in the
authenticated_content, the out-of-band value of each signaled
as-needed component is also included in the Out-Of-Band AAD.
Mahy Expires 22 January 2027 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft MLS Out-Of-Band AAD July 2026
4. Security Considerations
TODO Security
5. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
6. References
6.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-mls-extensions]
Robert, R., "The Messaging Layer Security (MLS)
Extensions", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-
mls-extensions-10, 6 July 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mls-
extensions-10>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
6.2. Informative References
[I-D.pham-mls-additional-wire-formats]
Pham, A., Mularczyk, M., Robert, R., and P. Slatala, "MLS
Wire Formats for PublicMessage and PrivateMessage without
authenticated_data", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
draft-pham-mls-additional-wire-formats-00, 21 October
2024, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pham-
mls-additional-wire-formats-00>.
Acknowledgments
TODO acknowledge.
Author's Address
Rohan Mahy
Email: rohan.ietf@gmail.com
Mahy Expires 22 January 2027 [Page 4]