Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Layer 2 Frames over MPLS Networks
draft-martini-l2circuit-encap-mpls-12

[Ballot comment]
Section 9 of draft-martini-l2circuit-trans-mpls-19 says:
  >
  > This document does not affect the underlying security issues of MPLS.
  >
  Please insert a reference to a document that discusses the security
  considerations of MPLS.

[Ballot comment]
Section 2., paragraph 0:
>    2. Special Note

  Suggest to add a summary of this note to the abstracts of the two documents.

RFC Editor advice on author list

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Two historic documents
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:34:26 -0700
From: Bob Braden
To: Mark Townsley , RFC Editor


>

Mark,

It is the contents that are historic, not the document ;-).  That is, these
documents will join the RFC archival
series and, and, we believe, ought to be consistent with the rest of the
series.  And given the
mischief it might cause, we really would rather not allow the long list of
authors in the
published RFC.  So we would recommend an editor (the person who takes the
trouble
to see through the publication process, and a Contributors section
lavishing credit
on the whole list.

Let us know if you have further questions.

RFC Editor/bb




>My question is with respect to the author/company header at the beginning
>of the document. How would you wish me to advise the authors on this?
>Would it be necessary to pick a single Editor and move the header into its
>own section, or could you publish as is give that this is historic in nature?
>
>Thanks,
>
>- Mark
>