Fundamental Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithms
draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-04
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2020-01-21
|
04 | (System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag) |
|
2015-10-14
|
04 | (System) | Notify list changed from mcgrew@cisco.com, msalter@restarea.ncsc.mil, kmigoe@nsa.gov, draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc@ietf.org to (None) |
|
2011-02-03
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue. |
|
2011-02-03
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'RFC 6090' added |
|
2011-02-03
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | Status Date has been changed to None from 2010-06-10 |
|
2011-02-02
|
04 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2010-12-15
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent. |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the document |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | Approval announcement text regenerated |
|
2010-12-14
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | Ballot writeup text changed |
|
2010-12-10
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-04.txt |
|
2010-07-16
|
04 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-07-15 |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Sean Turner |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot comment] This text from the Introduction could be a little clearer: Its intent is to provide the Internet community with a summary … [Ballot comment] This text from the Introduction could be a little clearer: Its intent is to provide the Internet community with a summary of the basic algorithms that predate any specialized or optimized algorithms, which can be used as a normative specification. Is this document intended for use as a normative specification or is it intended to provide pointers to other documents that can be used as normative specifications? |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel |
|
2010-07-15
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2010-07-14
|
04 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre |
|
2010-07-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Section 3.3.1 (Discriminant) includes: > > For each elliptic curve group, the discriminant - 16*(4*a^3 + 27*b^2) > must be … [Ballot comment] Section 3.3.1 (Discriminant) includes: > > For each elliptic curve group, the discriminant - 16*(4*a^3 + 27*b^2) > must be nonzero modulo p [S1986]; ... > I agree with the observation by Vijay Gurbani in the Gen-ART Review on 14-July-2010 that the hyphen can be misread as a minus sign. I suggest replacing placing "16*(4*a^3 + 27*b^2)" in commas. Section 3.3.2 (Security) begins: > > Security is highly dependent on the choice of these parameters. This > section gives normative guidance on acceptable choices. See also > Section 10 for informative guidance. > This use of "normative" in an Information RFC is unusual. I suggest the section be renamed and the rewording or removal of this paragraph. I propose "Choosing Secure ECC Parameters" as a useful section name. In section 9: s/May, 1994/May 1994/ |
|
2010-07-14
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2010-07-14
|
04 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
|
2010-07-14
|
04 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
|
2010-07-14
|
04 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant |
|
2010-07-11
|
04 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tina Tsou. |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | Tim Polk | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | Tim Polk | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-07-15 by Tim Polk |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | Tim Polk | Note field has been cleared by Tim Polk |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | Tim Polk | Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | Tim Polk | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2010-07-09
|
04 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2010-07-06
|
04 | Amanda Baber | IANA comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2010-06-20
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement of IPR regarding draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-03 | |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2010-06-11
|
04 | Tim Polk | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk |
|
2010-06-07
|
04 | Tim Polk | Draft Added by Tim Polk in state Publication Requested |
|
2010-05-21
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-03.txt |
|
2010-02-19
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-02.txt |
|
2009-10-26
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-01.txt |
|
2009-07-06
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-00.txt |