Simple Mail Transfer Protocol Extension for Message Transfer Priorities
draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-21

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
21 (System) Notify list changed from alexey.melnikov@isode.com, carlberg@g11.org.uk, draft-melnikov-smtp-priority@ietf.org, barryleiba@computer.org to barryleiba@computer.org
2012-08-21
21 (System) RFC published
2012-07-31
21 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-07-27
21 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-07-26
21 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-07-26
21 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-07-17
21 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-07-12
21 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-07-11
21 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-07-11
21 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2012-07-11
21 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-07-11
21 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-07-11
21 Pete Resnick IANA re-reviewed. Ready to go.
2012-07-11
21 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from Approved-announcement to be sent::External Party
2012-07-10
21 Pete Resnick Ballot approval text was generated
2012-07-10
21 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2012-07-10
21 Pete Resnick Waiting for re-review by IANA
2012-07-10
21 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::External Party from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2012-07-09
21 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-21.txt
2012-07-03
20 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-20.txt
2012-06-26
19 Pete Resnick Awaiting -20 to address a few small issues.
2012-06-26
19 Pete Resnick State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-06-21
19 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-19.txt
2012-06-12
18 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] Position for Wesley Eddy has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-12
18 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my issues.
2012-06-12
18 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] Position for Martin Stiemerling has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-11
18 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-11
18 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-18.txt
2012-06-11
17 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
Updating for (-17)

1) (addressed)

2) (addressed)

3) Section 5.4 restricts MTAs from rejecting messages based on priority or priority+size (arguing ...
2012-06-11
17 Robert Sparks Ballot discuss text updated for Robert Sparks
2012-06-08
17 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot discuss]
Updated DISCUSS based on -17:

>>> Please clarify this in the text.
>>>
>>> This mechanism can even increase the queue length at ...
2012-06-08
17 Martin Stiemerling Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-08
17 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-06-08
17 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-17.txt
2012-06-07
16 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-06-07
16 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-07
16 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
The document talks about end-to-end use across a mix of MTAs that do or do-not support the extensions, but not across MTAs with ...
2012-06-07
16 Wesley Eddy Ballot discuss text updated for Wesley Eddy
2012-06-07
16 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's comments
2012-06-07
16 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-06-06
16 BenoƮt Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-06-06
16 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
1) There is some tension between the requirements in Sections 4.1 and 4.2
(highlighted by a requirement in Section 10).

Section ...
2012-06-06
16 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-06-06
16 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-06-06
16 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Updated #4 based on some IMs with Alexey:

0) BTW - my initial thought about this draft was "I wish I had of thought ...
2012-06-06
16 Sean Turner Ballot comment text updated for Sean Turner
2012-06-06
16 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-06-05
16 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- (An almost "discuss"): 4.6 means that anyone who is ok to
send me a prio=9 message can cause me to send ...
2012-06-05
16 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-06-05
16 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Is it appropriate for the IETF to recommend the mappings for others (thinking here mostly about MMHS and NS/EP values) in App ...
2012-06-05
16 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
0) BTW - my initial thought about this draft was "I wish I had of thought of this ten yeas ago."  Really hoped ...
2012-06-05
16 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-06-05
16 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot discuss]
The document talks about end-to-end use across a mix of MTAs that do or do-not support the extensions, but not across MTAs with ...
2012-06-05
16 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Martin's DISCUSS point that in Section 5.1, "congestion" refers to existence of a queue at the application layer ...
2012-06-05
16 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-06-05
16 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot discuss]
I have a DISCUSS about this paragraph and the benefit of this mechanism:

Section 5.1., paragraph 6:

>    This extension provides ...
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
- I agree with Adrian about the really high number of priority levels

- What do the priority level mean in a multi-domain scenario, i ...
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot discuss]
I have a DISCUSS about this paragraph and the benefit of this mechanism:

Section 5.1., paragraph 6:

>    This extension provides ...
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
- I agree with Adrian about the really high number of priority levels

- What do the priority level mean in a multi-domain scenario, i ...
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot discuss]
I have a DISCUSS about this paragraph and the benefit of this mechanism:

Section 5.1., paragraph 6:

>    This extension provides ...
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
- I agree with Adrian about the really high number of priority levels

- What do the priority level mean in a multi-domain scenario, i ...
2012-06-05
16 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-04
16 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-06-04
16 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I agree with Adrian's comment that 19 priorities may be hard to manage.
2012-06-04
16 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-06-04
16 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document.

---

Are you sure you have not conflated priority and importance?
High priority messages ...
2012-06-04
16 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-02
16 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-06-02
16 Pete Resnick State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-06-02
16 Pete Resnick Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-07
2012-06-02
16 Pete Resnick Ballot has been issued
2012-06-02
16 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-06-02
16 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-02
16 Pete Resnick Created "Approve" ballot
2012-06-01
16 Barry Leiba
UPDATED PROTO writeup for draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-16

The publication of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority as a Proposed Standard is requested by an individual contributor.

(1) What type of RFC is ...
2012-06-01
16 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-16.txt
2012-06-01
15 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-15.txt
2012-05-29
14 Pete Resnick Ballot approval text was generated
2012-05-29
14 Pete Resnick Ballot approval text was generated
2012-05-28
14 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-05-26
14 Roni Even Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even.
2012-05-25
14 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-14.txt
2012-05-17
13 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2012-05-16
13 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-13 and has the following comments:

ICANN understands that, upon approval of this document, there are three IANA actions which must be ...
2012-05-14
13 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: SECOND ...
2012-05-14
13 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-05-14
13 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2012-05-14
13 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2012-05-14
13 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2012-05-13
13 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2012-05-13
13 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup
2012-05-13
13 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-13
13 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was changed
2012-05-13
13 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2012-05-02
13 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-13.txt
2012-04-25
12 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-12.txt
2012-04-25
11 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-11.txt
2012-04-19
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-04-19
10 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-10.txt
2012-04-03
09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Chris Lonvick.
2012-03-29
09 Pete Resnick State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-03-28
09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-03-15
09 Amanda Baber
ICANN understands that, upon approval of this document, there are four
IANA actions which must be completed.

First, in the SMTP Service Extensions registry of ...
2012-03-14
09 Roni Even Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Roni Even.
2012-03-07
09 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09.txt
2012-03-07
08 Alexey Melnikov New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-08.txt
2012-03-01
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even
2012-03-01
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick
2012-02-29
07 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2012-02-29
07 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>

To ...
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick
PROTO writeup for draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07

The publication of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority as a Proposed Standard is requested by an individual contributor.

(1) What type of RFC is being ...
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from Last Call Requested
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was changed
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick Ballot approval text was generated
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was generated
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2012-02-29
07 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-02-14
07 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt
2012-01-31
06 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-06.txt
2012-01-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-05.txt
2011-12-05
07 Pete Resnick Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> is the shepherd for this document.
2011-12-05
07 Pete Resnick State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching.
2011-12-05
07 Pete Resnick
State Change Notice email list has been changed to alexey.melnikov@isode.com, carlberg@g11.org.uk, draft-melnikov-smtp-priority@tools.ietf.org, barryleiba@computer.org from ...
2011-12-05
07 Pete Resnick Setting stream while adding document to the tracker
2011-12-05
07 Pete Resnick Stream changed to IETF from
2011-12-05
07 Pete Resnick Draft added in state AD is watching
2011-12-02
04 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-04.txt
2011-11-22
03 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-03.txt
2011-07-11
02 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-02.txt
2011-03-14
01 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-01.txt
2011-03-04
00 (System) New version available: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-00.txt