RSVP-TE Summary Fast Reroute Extensions for LSP Tunnels
draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-05
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(mpls WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mike Taillon , Tarek Saad , Rakesh Gandhi , Abhishek Deshmukh , Markus Jork , Vishnu Pavan Beeram | ||
| Last updated | 2017-09-10 (Latest revision 2017-03-09) | ||
| Replaced by | RFC 8796 | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | Nicolai Leymann | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | "Nicolai Leymann" <n.leymann@telekom.de> |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document defines Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Traffic- Engineering (TE) signaling extensions that reduce the amount of RSVP signaling required for Fast Reroute (FRR) procedures and subsequently improve the scalability of the RSVP-TE signaling when undergoing FRR convergence after a link or node failure. Such extensions allow the RSVP message exchange between the Point of Local Repair (PLR) and the Merge Point (MP) to be independent of the number of protected Label Switched Paths (LSPs) traversing between them when facility bypass FRR protection is used. The signaling extensions are fully backwards compatible with nodes that do not support them.
Authors
Mike Taillon
Tarek Saad
Rakesh Gandhi
Abhishek Deshmukh
Markus Jork
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)