Allowing Community Registrations in the Standards Tree
draft-nottingham-mediaman-standards-tree-00
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(mediaman WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Mark Nottingham | ||
| Last updated | 2024-01-25 (Latest revision 2023-07-23) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-mediaman-standards-tree | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Over time, it has become clear that there are media types which have the character of belonging in the standards tree (because they are not associated with any one vendor or person), but are not published by a standards body. This draft suggests an update to [RFC6838] to allow their registration.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)