Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers
draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-08
Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -07)
Unknown
I agree with Pete's comments about the ABNF, and share his dismay that these documents copy significant bits of standard ABNF productions from the URI document. I think that's a Bad Idea. Comment for the document shepherd: Thanks for a good, useful writeup!
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-26 for -07)
Unknown
I agree with Pete's observation about restating ABNF in this document.
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-28)
Unknown
[3.1: ABNF changed to reference 3986] 3.2: I suggest changing "MUST be" to "is" in both cases. The MUSTs are gratuitous. Then get rid of the reference to 2119. It's unnecessary.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-23 for -07)
Unknown
1. Introduction [RFC5928] defines a resolution mechanism to convert a secure flag, a host name or IP address, an eventually empty port, and an eventually empty transport to a list of IP address, port, and TURN transport tuples. I'm not understanding the use of "eventually empty" in this paragraph, and that's not a term I saw in [RFC5928]. Is it familiar to those skilled in the art of TURN?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-27)
Unknown
Thanks for handling my discuss and comments.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -07)
Unknown
In 3.1, last paragraph: The <host>, <port> and <transport> components are passed without The ABNF says turn-host and turn-port, not host and port. This is not a major nit, but it would be good to be consistent here. This inconsistency is repeated further in the document.